this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2025
589 points (98.4% liked)

Fuck Cars

13490 readers
1189 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 36 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (15 children)

Charge a tax per kilometer/mile driven for vehicles with batteries, hydrogen, NG, or internal combustion and all commercial vehicles reported and paid monthly.

Suddenly public transit will flourish.

[–] birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (9 children)

Not just that, a tax on ownership of a car as well.

The funds can then to go making public transit free for all, and improving its punctuality, availability, and comfort.

Since it's free at use and provided for by taxes, it will encourage a ton of people to use public transit.

And if you buy a bike, you get a subsidy.

[–] freebee@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Every transport costs something. Making public transport completely free can be a recipe for a financially troubled public transport company, and since no-one pays anyway (so no one actively decides to use PT over other means) there is little incentive to the public transport company to make it more reliable, higher comfort etc.

Public transport should be very affordable (and for sure way cheaper than private car usage), but not completely free. The only free thing is walking.

[–] birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

You're aware that taxes exist, right? They can be funded through those.

Besides, it's best to stop focusing on money like it's a holy cow ... focus on community and accessibility instead: and that is where public transit shines. It makes everything accessible.

[–] freebee@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago

A monetary value on transportation provides information about needed and desired routes. Without such information a PT company runs empty busses to empty stops, just for the subsidies.

The best way of funding PT is a combination of taxes and ticket income.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)