this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2025
442 points (97.8% liked)

Progressive Politics

3489 readers
184 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 3 weeks ago (11 children)

If you care more seriously, you'd take over the farms and distribute it. Taking over grocery stores without the greater infrastructure is just causing food shortages when the distribution points can't function, and the producers don't have funding

[–] NaibofTabr 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Oh yeah, they tried this in China in the 50s. It went great.

[–] somethingsnappy@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It would be stupid and terrible either way, but that was a government takeover.

[–] NaibofTabr -3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

but that was a government takeover.

How else do you imagine a large-scale infrastructure takeover would happen? an angry mob?

[–] somethingsnappy@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)
[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 2 points 3 weeks ago

It was something they could do a few times. It makes a nice story, but doesn't mean there was any significant change.

[–] NaibofTabr 1 points 3 weeks ago

The post is not a description of large-scale infrastructure takeover. That was literally the point of this comment thread.

load more comments (9 replies)