this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2025
112 points (98.3% liked)

Videos

16970 readers
74 users here now

For sharing interesting videos from around the Web!

Rules

  1. Videos only
  2. Follow the global Mastodon.World rules and the Lemmy.World TOS while posting and commenting.
  3. Don't be a jerk
  4. No advertising
  5. No political videos, post those to !politicalvideos@lemmy.world instead.
  6. Avoid clickbait titles. (Tip: Use dearrow)
  7. Link directly to the video source and not for example an embedded video in an article or tracked sharing link.
  8. Duplicate posts may be removed
  9. AI generated content must be tagged with "[AI] …" ^Discussion^

Note: bans may apply to both !videos@lemmy.world and !politicalvideos@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Flutter@lemmy.world
Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world
can@sh.itjust.works
qaz@lemmy.world
qaz@lemmy.blahaj.zone
qaz@sh.itjust.works
112
Why Everybody is Leaving Spotify (www.youtube.com)
submitted 1 week ago by mesamunefire@piefed.social to c/videos@lemmy.world
54 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] KindnessIsPunk@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I've been converting my FLACs to Opus 256 and have been very happy. I use copyparty to host the music on my PC and stream it to my phone when I need to.

[–] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (3 children)

What's the benefit of Opus 256? Haven't heard of that before.

[–] KindnessIsPunk@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It offers the same clarity as MP3 320 with a smaller file size It's just more efficient compression

[–] RaoulDuke85@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Is it like V0?

[–] KindnessIsPunk@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

Very similar but V0 is less efficient because it's bogged down by maintaining comparability. Opus will typically use somewhere between 25-50% less data while maintaining the same level of audio quality.