this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2025
35 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

2295 readers
88 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 day ago (26 children)

It's not even trying to solve the right problem. In the US, the NRC has given out licenses for new reactors. They're sitting there without the funding needed to go forward.

I have no doubt that licensing is a long process. It should be. That's how we keep fission power safe. But the more fundamental reason they're not getting built is because they reliably blow their budget and schedule.

[–] kgMadee2@mathstodon.xyz 2 points 1 day ago (19 children)

@frezik @dgerard but when did they ever even identify an actual problem?

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 day ago (18 children)

Even ignoring AI datacenter builds, we still need clean energy. I would be all for nuclear fission if it were at all economically viable. It just isn't.

[–] dgerard@awful.systems 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

yeah, even the green case for nuclear - which has been around for a long time - falters on wind and solar with battery just being hilariously cheaper. At this point the funding problem is interconnects.

[–] Cadbury_Moose@wandering.shop 3 points 1 day ago

@dgerard @frezik

The problem is alway interconnects.

(There aren't that many of them, and they tend to be scaled for fossil-fuelled power stations, probably 1MW being the smallest unless there were CHP setups with a grid feed.)

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)