this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2025
35 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

2305 readers
199 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 week ago (31 children)

It's not even trying to solve the right problem. In the US, the NRC has given out licenses for new reactors. They're sitting there without the funding needed to go forward.

I have no doubt that licensing is a long process. It should be. That's how we keep fission power safe. But the more fundamental reason they're not getting built is because they reliably blow their budget and schedule.

[–] kgMadee2@mathstodon.xyz 2 points 1 week ago (24 children)

@frezik @dgerard but when did they ever even identify an actual problem?

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 week ago (23 children)

Even ignoring AI datacenter builds, we still need clean energy. I would be all for nuclear fission if it were at all economically viable. It just isn't.

[–] JFranek@awful.systems 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If we're talking about the general West, then there new nuclear is probably fucked. Rest of the world still builds for reasonable costs. Not nuclear bro amounts, but still.

I think we could see a future where nuclear makes 5-10% of the world's electricity, which would technically make it a niche source of power, but it would also be a massive increase from today.

[–] diz@awful.systems 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Nuclear already makes 9% of world's electricity.

[–] JFranek@awful.systems 1 points 3 days ago

OK, my bad. I was thinking about scenario like this: https://eneroutlook.enerdata.net/total-electricity-generation-projections.html

If you assume doubling of electricity production by 2050 (development + electrification) then 10% of that would mean more than double nuclear production.

5% would not really be a massive increase, my mistake, but would still mean more builds than retirement.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

China has built a couple of reactors recently. They also went overbudget and overschedule.

[–] JFranek@awful.systems 2 points 1 week ago

Could be, I don't follow that closely. I'm not aware of any that come close to the level of shitshow of say, Hinckley Point C. That matters.

load more comments (20 replies)
load more comments (20 replies)
load more comments (26 replies)