925
PC Gamers Abandoning Windows 11 for Linux with Higher FPS & Fewer Interruptions
(www.geeky-gadgets.com)
this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2026
925 points (97.0% liked)
PC Gaming
13225 readers
1868 users here now
For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki
Rules:
- Be Respectful.
- No Spam or Porn.
- No Advertising.
- No Memes.
- No Tech Support.
- No questions about buying/building computers.
- No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
- No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
- No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
- Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Did this last May & haven't missed much. I don't play AAA slop though.
I'm thinking about going dual boot mode soon, as Manjaro is a godsend so far on my ThinkPad.
Just remember to have your installs on independant hard drives, not just partitions.
If you have set your mind to Manjaro I don't want to dissuade you, but if you are not yet strongly convinced of the distro I always like to point out that there were some issues with the distribution in the past (someone collected them here).
If you're just after an Arch-like distribution I think EndeavourOS is a very friendly distro without adding their own repositories on top of Arch. But again - if you're happy with Manjaro by all means also stay with it.
I have been over 1 year in EndeavourOS and I can't complain, no issues at all except when I screw up.
What does screwing up mean in this context?
Edited some files and had trouble login in, had to go live iso and edit them back.
I've only been using it for a few weeks now, but I'm having a great time with EndeavourOS. I've tried Linux every now and then for over 20 years now, but always bounced off for one reason or another. This time, I've never felt any desire to go back.
For me, my use case, and my hardware, EOS has been significantly less of a headache than Windows 11 was.
I am a Debian user, most of my homelab is on Debian but my desktop is on EndeavourOs, neither has any bullshit.
EndeavourOS, CachyOS, and Bazzite are back-up options in case I need to distro hop.
Which distro did you end up going with? Wanted to change my tower over from Windows. Guessing bazzite is appropriate?
I'd suggest trying a couple through live ISOs to see what works best out of the box with your hardware. I settled on CachyOS and definitely recommend it. Bazzite is ok, very stable, but keep in mind it is immutable which may hamper its abilities as a full desktop.
Oh it's immutable? Damn.
That explains some shit.
How do I go about switching to CachyOS? Just wipe the NVME and run an installer?
Yeah I'd wipe it if you're going to switch, always less headaches that way. CachyOS has a lot of options so I'll throw my 2 cents out there, I set it up with btrfs file system and the limine bootloader because it automatically sets up snapshots so you can roll back if something gets borked. It's also easier to get secure boot working with limine if you're trying to dual boot.
Kubuntu on my main workstation & Linux Mint on everything else.
Arch was described as hard mode but I installed EndeavourOS with KDE Plasma about a month and a half ago and it's been smooth sailing. Given all the programs I use have native linux clients and I don't play kernel level anti-cheat games at all.
The ArchWiki is the best hand-holding that you're going to get on Linux, it's the finest system administration documentation that the OS has available. But Arch doesn't "do things for you automatically", that's not their ethos. So it's hard mode until you've developed enough sysadmin skills to understand what the docs are telling you, and then it's easy mode because it all works great together and you've a phenomenal reference source.
We run SUSE at work; and when SUSE is working, it's a damn fine Linux - secure by default, up-to-date, efficient. But if it stops working, man alive, I wish we were using Arch instead. (Admittedly, we just redeploy anything on SUSE that stops working, which takes moments, whereas fixing Arch takes a while but at least you can fix it.)