You won't find out until it's over.
forkDestroyer
joined 11 months ago
First quit, then organise.
Their spot will be filled with a yes man for the party. Better to organize in your position of power and let them fire or remove you forcefully than to give up your seat.
Quitting won't help here, imo.
Both work. It's a sandbox game. I can't stand the cardboard cutout characters, but the mechanics are fun for a bit.
Convinced a majority of the use cases are from corporations mandating employees to use it.
Not liking that all of the time travelers on 4chan seem to be pointing towards a 2027 surprise like this.
This is why I donate blood. Gotta offload some microplastics.
This is how I found out that lobsters don't have a single centralized brain like humans do.
"if you do it correctly" holds a lot of weight to this argument. I'd be worried of anyone who wants to start from scratch, instead of building on the current foundation.
You make good points, though. I'm just more skeptical than you.
I regret to inform you that salaries in tech are not as glorious as I thought they'd be. I'd be surprised to have enough to own a farm any time soon.
Would be nice to be able to afford a house, though.
instead voting for independent anarchist parties which try to get rid of as many laws and government institutions and also nationalize anything the people will be better served by, under collective ownership.
Once the laws are gone/things are deregulated, the corpos will likely take over. Nationalizing sounds good, but likely won't end well without regulations, imo.
I'm being a bit extra but...
Your statement:
The article headline is wildly misleading, bordering on being just a straight up lie.
The article headline:
A Developer Accidentally Found CSAM in AI Data. Google Banned Him For It
The general story in reference to the headline:
- He found csam in a known AI dataset, a dataset which he stored in his account.
- Google banned him for having this data in his account.
- The article mentions that he tripped the automated monitoring tools.
The article headline is accurate if you interpret it as
"A Developer Accidentally Found CSAM in AI Data. Google Banned Him For It" ("it" being "csam").
The article headline is inaccurate if you interpret it as
"A Developer Accidentally Found CSAM in AI Data. Google Banned Him For It" ("it" being "reporting csam").
I read it as the former, because the action of reporting isn't listed in the headline at all.
^___^
view more: next ›
Wasn't he manufacturing arms for them? Of course, in a way to help go against the grain the most while doing it.