this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2026
352 points (99.7% liked)

Buy European

9726 readers
753 users here now

Overview:

The community to discuss buying European goods and services.


Matrix Chat of this community


Rules:

  • Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. No direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments.

  • Do not use this community to promote Nationalism/Euronationalism. This community is for discussing European products/services and news related to that. For other topics the following might be of interest:

  • Include a disclaimer at the bottom of the post if you're affiliated with the recommendation.

  • No russian suggestions.

Feddit.uk's instance rules apply:

  • No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia or xenophobia.
  • No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.
  • No harassment, dogpiling or doxxing of other users.
  • Do not share intentionally false or misleading information.
  • Do not spam or abuse network features.
  • Alt accounts are permitted, but all accounts must list each other in their bios.
  • No generative AI content.

Useful Websites

Benefits of Buying Local:

local investment, job creation, innovation, increased competition, more redundancy.

European Instances

Lemmy:

Friendica:

Matrix:


Related Communities:

Buy Local:

Continents:

European:

Buying and Selling:

Boycott:

Countries:

Companies:

Stop Publisher Kill Switch in Games Practice:


Banner credits: BYTEAlliance


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Google has criticized the European Unionโ€™s intentions to achieve digital sovereignty through open-source software. The company warned that Brusselsโ€™ policies aimed at reducing dependence on American tech companies could harm competitiveness. According to Google, the idea of replacing current tools with open-source programs would not contribute to economic growth.

Kent Walker, Googleโ€™s president of global affairs and chief legal officer, warned of a competitive paradox that Europe is facing. According to the Financial Times, he said that creating regulatory barriers would be harmful in a context of rapid technological advancement. His remarks came just days after the European Commission concluded a public consultation assessing the transition to open-source software.

Googleโ€™s chief legal officer clarified that he is not opposed to digital sovereignty, but recommended making use of the โ€œbest technologies in the world.โ€ Walker suggested that American companies could collaborate with European firms to implement measures ensuring data protection. Local management or servers located in Europe to store information are among the options.

The EU is preparing a technological sovereignty package aimed at eliminating dependence on third-party software, such as Googleโ€™s. After reviewing proposals, it concluded that reliance on external suppliers for critical infrastructure entails economic risks and creates vulnerabilities. The strategy focuses not only on regulation but also on adopting open-source software to achieve digital sovereignty.

According to Google, this change would represent a problem for users. Walker argues that the market moves faster than legislation and warns that regulatory friction will only leave European consumers and businesses behind in what he calls โ€œthe most competitive technological transition we have ever seen.โ€ As it did with the DMA and other laws, Google is playing on fear. Kent Walker suggested that this initiative would stifle innovation and deny people access to the โ€œbest digital tools.โ€

The promotion of open-source software aims to break dependence on foreign suppliers, especially during a period of instability caused by the Trump administration. The European Union has highlighted the risks of continuing under this system and proposes that public institutions should have full control over their own technology.

According to a study on the impact of open-source software, the European Commission found that it contributes between โ‚ฌ65 billion and โ‚ฌ95 billion annually to the European Unionโ€™s GDP. The executive body estimates that a 10% increase in contributions to open-source software would generate an additional โ‚ฌ100 billion in growth for the blocโ€™s economy.

all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] comrade_twisty@feddit.org 82 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

FTFY: Many European citizens are appalled by Googles embrace of a fascist surveillance technocracy. Some are still asleep unfortunately.

[โ€“] Drusas@fedia.io 38 points 4 days ago (3 children)

According to Google, the idea of replacing current tools with open-source programs would not contribute to economic growth.

Aside from this being bullshit aimed at protecting their own bottom line, not everything needs to contribute to economic growth.

[โ€“] freedomPusher@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Indeed. And as well, even if growth were needed, Google is advocating for US growth at Europeโ€™s expense.

[โ€“] luisgutz@feddit.uk 12 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Also, open source is likely to be cheaper, so in that sense, it will contribute less to growth as less money will be spent.

Also, they fail to mention that all US companies can be forced to obey Washington, even if the servers are in the EU

This is one reason "real" growth (i.e. adjusted for price inflation) just matters more. Like who cares if we just increased prices and managed to pay for the same anount of things?

[โ€“] mapto@feddit.bg 2 points 3 days ago

Certainly taking back control of own infrastructure and developing in-house expertise, while saving thousands on unused cloud resources contributes to economic growth.

[โ€“] DmMacniel@feddit.org 66 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

he said that creating regulatory barriers would be harmful in a context of rapid technological advancement.

such as? "One more Datacentre" ain't it, bro.

Walker suggested that American companies could collaborate with European firms to implement measures ensuring data protection

Could, yeah sure why haven't you already; what would change?

Local management or servers located in Europe to store information are among the options.

Just like it's done today? So what would change?

According to Google, this change would represent a problem for users.

laughable

โ€œthe most competitive technological transition we have ever seen.โ€

Uhm yeah sure, one more datacentre to replace humans and deny them income. That's not a great transition.

deny people access to the โ€œbest digital tools.โ€

If those bilions are put into supporting open source tools, THOSE will be the best digital tools and there is nothing that Google/Adobe/Microslop can do about.


Walker knows that he and Google have no cards and bluffing, creating bogeyman are their only option.

[โ€“] vodkasolution@feddit.it 56 points 5 days ago

According to Google, the idea of replacing current tools with open-source programs would not contribute to GOOGLE'S economic growth.

FTFY

[โ€“] mumblerfish@lemmy.world 52 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Ah, yes, the famous absense of economic growth from open source projects! We all know about the open source failures such as linux which checks notes... powers virtually every data center and super computer in the world. Hm, anyone know if all of todays technological infrastructure contributes to economic growth, or nah?

[โ€“] black0ut@pawb.social 13 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Not only that, but both ChromeOS and Android run on top of the Linux kernel

[โ€“] mumblerfish@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago

And I think youtube is possible thanks to ffmpeg. Alphabet is a search engine, if even that, without open source.

[โ€“] Tuuktuuk@nord.pub 43 points 5 days ago

This is a very good sign.

This is basically Google saying that the legislation is efficient.

[โ€“] MrFinnbean@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago

Anything google criticizes just makes me want to use it harder.

[โ€“] KaChilde@sh.itjust.works 29 points 4 days ago (1 children)

If Google is criticising it, Iโ€™m backing it 110%.

reducing dependence on American tech companies could harm competitiveness.

Google over here living in Bizarro world.

[โ€“] forrgott@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 4 days ago

Forcing us to be competitive will reduce competitiveness!!

Ummm...

[โ€“] AnnieByniaeth@feddit.uk 25 points 4 days ago

Remind me again what Google Android is built on? Oh and what is that operating system underlying the Google Chromebook? ๐Ÿง

According to a monopoly more options will harm competitiveness.

Lmao, they even open with that.

[โ€“] vpol@feddit.uk 24 points 5 days ago (1 children)

According to Google, the idea of replacing current tools with open-source programs would not contribute to economic growth.

US economic growth? 100%.

Google doesnโ€™t do anything positive for US economic growth either. Quite the opposite.

[โ€“] Blueoaky@mander.xyz 24 points 5 days ago

Europe is big enough to have its own software. And the next generation of software should be open source - enough with monopoles

[โ€“] Chais@sh.itjust.works 15 points 4 days ago

I mean yea, your dealer wouldn't condone you going sober, either.

[โ€“] Zier@fedia.io 15 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Europe needs a Search Engine that puts Google to shame.

[โ€“] forkDestroyer 8 points 4 days ago

Wouldn't be as hard these days, based on how Google search has been eshittified.

[โ€“] Renohren@lemmy.today 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Yeah... I don't think it will harm economic growth (it's just Goggle, Microsoft etc who won't get maintenance and sys admin contracts, plenty of other probably will) . But let's entertain Google's point of view: even if we sacrifice a bit of economic growth, at least we'll not get blackmailed by those who threaten us. Whereas right now? We're threading very muddy waters.

[โ€“] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 10 points 4 days ago

I'm not only loving the fact that Europe finally breaks free from the US in just about every area, but I'm loving this even more, that the EU goes full for open source software, not "use software from this evil European company instead"

Ofcourse they would.

[โ€“] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 12 points 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Kiss my ass, Google. The only Google anything I use is my email for 'official' purposes (and anything tied to credit card purchases.... mostly).

Europe has huge privacy problems with its chat control and other crap, but the move to FOSS is something I can get behind 100%

Edit: also youtube. I basically am watching something all the time. Or listening to it.

[โ€“] freedomPusher@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The only Google anything I use is my email for โ€˜officialโ€™

Why is that? Most public services use Microsoft for email, I find.

FWIW, I boycott both; which means I am mostly using postal mail.

[โ€“] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yeah YT is a hard one to quit, not because it is "good" but simply because that's where literally all video content on the internet goes. If it were any other site like Odysee we'd all be there, simple as.

That said I still use Newpipe or Grayjay to access it, rather than direct.

I use newpipe and freetube. Newpipe is great, but it doesn't work well with subscription feeds. And freetube positively sucks with VPNs.

[โ€“] als@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 4 days ago

"Arresting murderers will not increase community safety", says murderer

That's how you know they're on the right track, and everyone should do the same regardless of political opinions or national affiliations. Take back your goddamn digital freedom! It saddens me that many of you (the royal you) don't even know what was stolen from us.

[โ€“] birdwing@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

This is economic freedom. Google once said: "Don't be evil".

Now Google is big and spies on everyone and opposes competitors. Sorry not sorry.

[โ€“] oxideseven@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 days ago

Oh no mah economic growths!

[โ€“] androidul@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Google and not only, big US corps in general, have been using EU citizens data to improve their AI models and then charge an excruciating price to use.

No wonder no one is fond ofโ€ฆ why do I want to feed these dumbasses data for free. I prefer to do it on my own turf and terms, luckily Mistral AI is becoming more powerful. Why doesnโ€™t Apple/Google allow European users to tap into Mistral AI and offer only US AI choices?

Watch out, we shouldn't have too powerful big tech and companies of our own.

Just powerful enough to stand against outsiders, but not powerful enough to grow beyond and seize European politics into corruption.

Cry me a river, you cunts.

[โ€“] NorthoftheBorder@lemmy.ca 5 points 4 days ago

Iโ€™ve gotten rid of almost all Google services except for Gmail, and thatโ€™s next on the list.

[โ€“] atro_city@fedia.io 7 points 5 days ago

Fuck you Google! If you don't like it, GTFO

[โ€“] jlow@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 4 days ago

If Europe has any sense they would see that as being on the right track (just like I get my media recommendations from bigot snowflakes whining about things being "woke". Must be good then, doucheface!)

[โ€“] Nx2991@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Don't worry Google you still got Ireland wrapped around your finger. ๐Ÿ˜‚