this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2023
67 points (77.7% liked)

World News

32285 readers
1 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GarbageShootAlt@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 2 years ago (15 children)

All states are fundamentally violent, what are you imagining to be a "decent" country where there is no violence by the state?

[–] Tretiak@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago (6 children)

It also precludes the fact that prior to State formation and complex agriculture, tribal society wasn't exactly all that peaceful either. Violence is fundamental to human behavior.

[–] GarbageShootAlt@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 2 years ago (3 children)

In a Marxist sense, any class society has a state, but that's a little beside the point.

[–] Tretiak@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Well, to each his own. I'm not a Marxist.

[–] GarbageShootAlt@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Well, aside from that violence does still exist outside of states as you say, it was to explain my earlier comment about all states being violent, since their role is to mediate class antagonisms, which has historically manifested as the owning classes keeping the bulk of the working classes in a state of desperation for the sake of manipulating bartering power.

[–] Tretiak@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Right. I understand the point. But it shouldn’t be a surprise to anyone to think State’s exercise violence in a much greater capacity, because State’s are much more powerful than individuals.

To me it’s a criticism that ranks right up there with the complaint that State’s are inherently dishonest, and they are, to be sure. But if State’s are inherently violent/dishonest, it’s only because people are inherently violent and dishonest. That’s something that sits at the root of what humans are, and by extension, wraps itself up in qualms of everything humans do and create for themselves.

Cooperation is definitely a part of who we are, to be sure. My whole point though is that if you look at civilization, their existence isn’t a spontaneous occurrence, despite the fact that civilizations require an ‘enormous’ level of cooperation to sustain themselves. It isn’t ‘natural’, in that sense. Cooperation follows coercion, which is needed to keep the peace, just as it’s more easily and eagerly used to conduct violence.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)