this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2023
69 points (94.8% liked)

utility cycling

735 readers
1 users here now

🚴🚲 Welcome to the Utility Cycling Community! 🚲🚴

Are you a passionate cyclist who believes that bicycles can transform the way we move around our cities and towns? Are you interested in exploring the world of utility biking, where bicycles are a tool for practicality, sustainability, and adventure? If so, you've come to the right place!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Treevan@aussie.zone 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (12 children)

Could we subsidise all bikes and let people pay more for the "E" part if they so choose? How is an Ebike any better than a normal one? It has a more significant footprint behind it.

Problem is, if you subsidise anything the prices rise to match the subsidy. Perhaps tax breaks for bicycle and e-bike riders with enough degrees of separation that bike manufacturers and retailers don't see it coming.

[–] ansik@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (4 children)

A couple of years back I saw some napkin math claiming e-bikes has a lower CO-2 impact than normal bikes or walking since power plants and motors are more effective than your body at energy conversion. Couldn't find the same source (and it was in my language anyways) but did find this (with a ton of other sites claiming similar things when searching)

[–] Treevan@aussie.zone 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Aren't we supposed to be growing and eating local food in a solarpunk future?

Just finished reading @poVoq@slrpnk.net's link, and it is a bit more detailed than the food footprint.

emissions of bike manufacturing. Researchers have calculated the greenhouse gas emissions caused by manufacturing an aluminum e-bike at 320 kg. [8] This compares to 212 kg for the production of an unassisted aluminum bicycle and 35 kg for an unassisted steel bicycle.

[–] ansik@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I'd love to, but until then I don't want to starve or hold off on movement :D

Thanks for bringing my attention to that source, much better! Seems similar as to how I remembered it but I could obviously have worded it better

[–] Treevan@aussie.zone 1 points 2 years ago

Thank poVoq. lowtech is the posterchild for most of what we are discussing.

I find it interesting you can get basically different results by focusing on singular points. I can't imagine in the future there will be a strong mining industry still churning out batteries that fit every proprietary connector. Perhaps if the e-bike industry went open source and shared designs would be the best of both worlds.

A used, commonly found steel framed bike with nonproprietary parts, local carbohydrates, downhill both ways sounds like the perfect situation.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)