this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2023
146 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

39044 readers
241 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] noodlejetski@lemm.ee 44 points 2 years ago (19 children)
[–] boff@lemmy.one 17 points 2 years ago (17 children)

Genuine question, why does it matter? Why shouldn't a project choose a production ready method of creating cross platform compatible code to avoid duplication of efforts and cost?

[–] noodlejetski@lemm.ee 37 points 2 years ago (6 children)

why does it matter?

because most people use more than one program at the same time? fire up that one along with, I dunno, Spotify and Discord and Slack, and suddenly your midrange laptop's RAM is all but gone.

[–] boff@lemmy.one 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Same thing happens to me if I were to open each of those apps as chrome tabs.

The apps you listed provide a web version also. Adding choice to the customer experience is a good thing!

[–] noodlejetski@lemm.ee 27 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Adding choice to the customer

"you can have your memory eaten by our website in your browser, or by our website in a separate browser window wearing fake moustache and glasses" doesn't seem to be much of a choice.

meanwhile if you launch their services using something other than a glorified Chrome tab, like spotify-qt or ripcord, they both end up consuming like one tenth of the resources the official clients do.

[–] boff@lemmy.one 4 points 2 years ago

Why do you think everyone cares to optimize every single ounce of their ram memory. There is a lot more to UX than that.

I would rather an imperfect choice than none at all

[–] nobloat@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That's a bad analogy. A browser with 5 tabs is not like having 5 different browsers open.

[–] boff@lemmy.one 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

User experience is not just about optimizing every little bit of your RAM consumption. They're are plenty of other factors as well

[–] anlumo@feddit.de 3 points 2 years ago

Yes, and UX is bad in web applications. I‘m saying that as a web application developer.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)