this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2024
78 points (96.4% liked)

World News

32285 readers
1 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bartolomeo@suppo.fi 5 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Only 56% of the population has access to a drinking water source.

I don't get it... how do the rest survive?

[–] voight@hexbear.net 12 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Containers alone. Or a mixture of containers for important things & low quality sources if available

[–] bartolomeo@suppo.fi 1 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Yes but they must fill their containers at a drinking water source...

Maybe it's a language thing I'm not understanding.

[–] Madison_rogue@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes but they must fill their containers at a drinking water source…

Maybe it’s a language thing I’m not understanding.

I assume the article means that only 56% of the population have access to modernized drinking water sources (i.e. properly treated fresh water). More than likely SEED (Veolia) has been only concerned with profit, therefore neglecting to extend infrastructure outside urban areas.

[–] bartolomeo@suppo.fi 2 points 1 year ago

Ok yea, that makes more sense to me. Thanks.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)