Formula 1

10253 readers

38 users here now

Welcome to Formula1 @ lemmy.world Lemmy's largest community for Formula 1 and related racing series

2025 Calendar

Location	Date
🇧🇪 Belgium	25-27 Jul
🇭🇺 Hungary	01-03 Aug
🇳🇱 Netherlands	29-31 Aug
🇮🇹 Italy	05-07 Sep
🇦🇿 Azerbaijan	19-21 Sep
🇸🇬 Singapore	03-05 Oct
🇺🇸 United States	17-19 Oct
🇲🇽 Mexico	24-26 Oct
🇧🇷 Brazil	07-09 Nov
🇺🇸 United States	20-22 Nov
🇶🇦 Qatar	28-30 Nov
🇦🇪 Abu Dhabi	05-07 Dec

Rules

Be respectful to everyone: drivers, lemmings etc
No gambling, crypto or NFTs
Spoilers are allowed
Non English articles should include a translation in the comments by deepl.com or similar
Paywalled articles should include at least a brief summary in the comments, the wording of the article should not be altered
Social media posts should be posted as screenshots with a link for those who want to view it
Memes are allowed on Monday only as we all do like a laugh or 2, but don’t want to become formuladank.
No duplicate posts, or posts of different news companies that say the same thing.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Photographer@lemmy.world

wes@lemmy.world

bwoah@lemmy.world

That Lando jump start (www.planetf1.com)

submitted 1 year ago by davetapley@lemmy.world to c/formula1@lemmy.world

27 comments fedilink hide all child comments

“The stewards reviewed positioning/marshalling system data, video and determined that the video appeared to show that Car 4 moved before the start signal was given,” their report began.

“However, the FIA approved and supplied transponder fitted on the car did not indicate a jump start.

“Article 48.1 a) of the Formula One Sporting Regulations states clearly that the judgment of whether or not there was a jump start is to be made in accordance with the transponder, which did not show a jump start. In the circumstances, we took no further action

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] davetapley@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (12 children)

So conflicted. On the one hand good to see them actually sticking to the rules as written, but then: common sense 😵‍💫

[–] Species8472@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 year ago

You are forgetting the Carlos Sainz las Vegas incident. Car damaged due to track issues (some cover sucked out), needed to replace several parts, went over limit in spare parts = grid penalty.

Stewards acknowlegd this was not his/Ferrari's fault and thus had common sense, but the rulebook did not foresee any exceptions for this scenario. So they felt obligated to apply the rulebook.

This is a case where they also literally apply the rules.

load more comments (11 replies)