this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2023
305 points (100.0% liked)

196

17880 readers
597 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Trundle@lemmy.world 19 points 2 years ago (8 children)

Mmmkay, but if I were to buy one of those nut butter steaks, it sure as shit better come with one of those little meat diapers in the bottom of the package.

Don’t you cheat me.

[–] thepianistfroggollum@lemmynsfw.com 13 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Those meat diapers can go get fucked. Every time I buy ground meat that uses them, the actual meat is usually a significant amount of ounces lower than the advertised weight.

Go tube or go home. In my experience they're typically a bit heavier than the advertised weight.

[–] Trundle@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You know, I never even thought about how much liquid weight those little diapers accounted for.

I have heard of “tube steak”. I’ll check into that.

[–] Trundle@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Nope nope nope… Fuuuuuuck that noise. Tube steak appears to not be a viable option.

For me.

[–] rmuk@feddit.uk 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

...I thought "tube steak" just meant "penis"?

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] leftleaninghaggis@lemmy.radio 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Sigh... Here we go again... unzips

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)