Furthermore there are many changes to NumPy internals, including continuing to migrate code from C to C++, that will make it easier to improve and maintain NumPy in the future.

I realise that C can be rather low level a lot of the time, but I'm not sure I'd pick C++ to help keep things easy to maintain. It opens up a Pandora's box of possibilities.

[–] cbarrick@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (8 children)

With a good style/best-practice guide, C++ can be quite productive of a language to work with.

Those kinds of guides typically define which standard/convention to use and which features not to use (cough exceptions cough).

I highly recommend Google's C++ style guide: https://google.github.io/styleguide/cppguide.html.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Do you think a style guide is enough for an open source code base? Contributions could be coming from lots of directions, and the code review process to enforce a style guide is going to be a lot of work. Even rejecting something takes time.

[–] balder1993@programming.dev 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

This kind of thing can be easily automated nowadays. It’s not really a problem.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago

Yup, we do it for Python and Javascript at work, and I do it on my Rust projects (and my older C projects). I don't see why C++ should be any more difficult.

load more comments (5 replies)

load more comments (6 replies)