this post was submitted on 23 May 2024

154 points (78.9% liked)

Technology

71955 readers

3058 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related news or articles.
Be excellent to each other!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

L3s@lemmy.world

enu@lemmy.world

technopagan@lemmy.world

L4s@lemmy.world

L3s@hackingne.ws

L4s@hackingne.ws

154

The double sexism of ChatGPT’s flirty “Her” voice (www.vox.com)

submitted 1 year ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

69 comments fedilink hide all child comments

(page 2) 25 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] BrownianMotion@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I've listened to it, and it sounds nothing like Scarlett does. I had to find a movie with Scarlett in it to compare with, and I can honestly tell you ChatGPT sounds nothing like Natasha in Black Widow.

(Joke aside, ChatGPT doesn't sound like Scarlett at all).

load more comments (3 replies)

[+] Cringe2793@lemmy.world -28 points 1 year ago (9 children)

She has a very generic sounding American sultry woman voice, imo. Seems like a money grab to me. She's not dumb, she sued Disney for some nonsense, and now she's starting shit with the soon to be biggest company in the world.

She's just latching onto the fact that any time women complain about shit like this, and use words like sexism, gaslighting, misogyny, etc, it gets a lot of traction in the media.

What a horrible woman.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Didn't she sue Disney for breach of contract? That doesn't sound like nonsense.

[–] Cringe2793@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Nope. She sued because she felt she was owed more money. Disney released the movie on their streaming service at the same time as it was released in cinema.

There was no "breach of contract", otherwise she would have won easily. Instead, she and Disney settled out of court. She was just being greedy. Disney probably didn't want the bad publicity and paid her off.

load more comments (4 replies)

[–] VerticaGG@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ok woman hater

[–] Cringe2793@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Resorting to name calling I see 😂😂😂 that's what happens when you know I'm right, but refuse to change your wrong views.

[–] VerticaGG@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Oh honey. Oh no that wasnt an insult. Id be more creative! I was stating a fact. Your posting history shows us that the Phantasm of scapegoat is allowing you to stand on both sides of the contradiction, simultaneously.

So, you can keep going down this path youre on. We both know where it leads though. Loneliness, and nothing good.

OR: Watch this Kratos lookin guy break down what's been going on in this area of thought for over a decade, and begin to heal, and then maybe you'll be able to make friends with people without expecting anything in return.

You deserve that. You deserve to be on both sides of that, and not the phantasm.

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 1 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

Watch this

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] Cringe2793@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

That's a lot of assumptions you're making about me. I mean, if you can't believe that scarjo is doing this for the money, then so be it.

Far be it from me to try to tell you how to think. Believe what you want. I really can't be bothered to correct you. And yes, what you're doing is name calling, just because I believe a different thing from you. I shall not be replying to you any more, since you have no basic respect. Cheers!

load more comments (7 replies)

load more comments