this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2023
55 points (84.8% liked)

No Stupid Questions

42141 readers
984 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For those who are unaware: A couple billionaires, a pilot, and one of the billionaires' son are currently stuck inside an extremely tiny sub a couple thousand meters under the sea (inside of the sub with the guys above).

They were supposed to dive down to the titanic, but lost connection about halfway down. They've been missing for the past 48 hours, and have 2 days until the oxygen in the sub runs out. Do you think they'll make it?

(page 5) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Yoz@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (6 children)

People hating coz they billionaire πŸ˜–. Pray for them, hope they survive

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] robotman5@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MiddleWeigh@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm gonna go out on limb and say they're no longer with us.

[–] RickRussell_CA@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Yeah I don't think you're very far out on that limb. The likelihood of successful rescue is extremely low.

I can't really believe anybody would spend $250K on a submarine expedition with the guy in charge of Ocean Gate, and his incredibly cavalier attitude toward safety.

[–] pineapplefriedrice@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I mean everyone says "omg they're crazy", but it's so easy to say that, and all of us have at least a few things that we'd be willing to do that an onlooker could point to and say "lol why do that when you might die".

There's nothing wrong with taking an informed risk, and it's really up to you what kind of risk you're comfortable taking. Most of these people seem to have a consistently high risk tolerance, and three of them were very experienced, so I don't think it's fair to call them "stupid" or "idiots" just because your risk/reward assessment doesn't line up with theirs. If that was their idea of living the best life possible, then that's good for them.

I'd also say that the majority of people in life aren't as happy as they could be because they're too scared to let go of convenience and familiarity. People turn down dream opportunities because it means moving to a different country, they stay in jobs they hate because they're scared of what comes next, they don't travel to places because five years ago someone died there, and they stay in unfulfilling relationships because they hate the thought of being alone or having to meet new people. So if you're the kind of person who basically spends their life on the couch with the same old people in the same old place eating the same old food watching the same old shows and you dream about what could've been, I'm not sure you have the right to lob criticisms at people who chose to get up and do stuff.

[–] jcg@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I get what you're saying about taking a calculated risk - like going for a bungee jump or paragliding or bouldering. However, the more you read about this particular craft the more you realize how much they ignored highly standard safety procedures and design. So I feel like the people criticizing are less saying "why bungee jump when you could die" and more saying "why would you bungee jump without a cord and pay 250,000 dollars for the privilege."

[–] Seven@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The idea here is that messing up due to unforseen problems and things that couldn't have been included in calculations is a "part of the experience" but messing up due to recklessness and disregarding required safety features isn't in my opinion. Daredevils and adventurers would first and foremost work on safety so that they can keep on doing their extreme stuff. We can go to the space, to the very bottom of the ocean, to many other places, and we can do these because we have been careful. The times when we messed up are usually when we could call it like the infamous rocket explosion of NASA, which the engineers did try to warn NASA before launching it, only for NASA to disregard those. In extreme adventures, safety is a golden rule and death is a rare possiblity, not something to expect.

[–] pineapplefriedrice@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Lol, we aren't able to do "extreme stuff" because of safety, we're able to do it in spite of that. We would advance much faster if we didn't value human life, full stop. It's one of humanity's biggest, albeit necessary inefficiencies. That value isn't the norm either - throughout history we've generally been pretty comfortable with the expectation of death in exchange for advancement, and we owe a lot of our modern knowledge and technology to people who suffered for it. You're taking a tiny sample size, i.e. the western world for the past 60ish years, and pretending that it reflects a precedent. To the extent that you need humans, safety and risk are always going to compete with one another, and human life is always going to be disposable to some actors.

[–] MiddleWeigh@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yea when I first heard about this I kinda just wrote them off tbh. The ocean is massive and moving, plus they're in a glorified, malfunctioning, soup can.

I've never heard of the guy, but I can imagine based on that description jeez.

"It's all apart of the experience" probably.

Maybe for a camping trip, but not this lol. Your already completely and literally out of your element.

[–] hydra@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I've heard somewhere it's easier and safer to explore deep space than to explore the deep ocean.

[–] MiddleWeigh@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I wonder...is that only because we use probes? Or is it something to do with atmospheric pressure? Like I'm assuming water is heavier than space so even if you had a space suit on underwater you'd still get crushed or eaten by some big ass squid.

I'd love if a scientist could weigh in on this.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] danieljackson@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

They should given cyanide pills to everybody in that metal pipe, like they did for all the missions to the moon.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zansacu@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I think a better question would be "Should they be rescued?". Billionaires are a stain on humanity. You simply do not need that much wealth for any valid purpose.

[–] ben914@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (4 children)

I have plenty of criticisms about billionaires, but saying we should just let them die is going too far.

[–] i_simp_4_tedcruz@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

After they've milked the rest of humanity to amass all that wealth, your solution is to spend more money on going to get them? They fucked around and found out.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Blakerboy777@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They are presented with the same choice every single day to condemn people to die by hoarding their unfathomable wealth. Anyone of them could singlehandedly end all deaths from polio or TB, but instead every single day they decide that the idea of only being worth $2 million dollars is so horrifying that they'd rather allow the deaths to continue unabated.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] malloc@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

How so? Seems like a shit way to die to me. It’s not fast. Plus you are crammed in with a bunch of other dudes.

I guess once you pass out from anoxic brain injury, it might peaceful.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ThisIsMyLemmyLogin@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The only outcome we can be sure of at this point is that the company responsible for this mess is going to have to answer a lot of questions.

[–] JeffCraig@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

And some massive lawsuits to handle.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] mrfriki@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] wabafee@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

With all the news I keep hearing. I dont think they will survive. I guess thats one less billionaires in the world. Probaby for the better.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sayitghoul@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This could have been easily avoided by having a cable between the ship and the sub no? Seems like a sensible safety option...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] zepheriths@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Wishing death on people is a very garbage take

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] cheeseblintzes@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Rescued? Maybe. Rescued alive? Doubtful.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί