What can be done by presidential mandate can be undone by presidential mandate. If the Democrats weren’t buffoons they might try doing the mandating at the beginning of their term, when it can be in place for 4-8 years, instead of at the end of it when it will be in place for a month at best.
this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2025
394 points (98.8% liked)
News
29506 readers
1851 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
but doing it at the beginning of his term would require him to actually be pushing hard for this.
He doesn't want it to ever actually take place, just like Obama and Net Neutrality
It will likely take longer to get this implemented than it will for Trump to rescind it.
He put his energy into green energy that was in the IRA.
If he had pushed this earlier and then the green energy stuff now, you'd say "why didn't he do the green energy at the start of his term?" There no winning when that's all you say.
Why couldn't he do both at the start of the term?
Ah the classic "why didn't they do everything, everywhere, all at once?!"
True, he was too busy approving a record number of fracking permits. We can't expect him to do everything!
You need to solve the demand problem.
A lot fewer people would be demanding oil if they could get a cheap EV, but Biden slapped 100% tariffs on those.
This isn't one and done, nor is it a small item. You reallllly want to build up your own industry. Then see if you can dominate the world in one way or another.
Given how important climate change is, we really don't want to wait to build up our own industry, especially when the entrenched interests prefer to drag that out as long as possible to maximize profits on existing fossil fuel tech. After all, the US had just as much time (in fact more) to build up that industry as China yet look at where we are compared to them.
I was always on the side of saving the legacy manufacturers since entire supply chains affect so many people and have a huge impact on our national economy. We want them to succeed. They clearly don’t. They’d rather sow FUD while denying reality to eke out more profitable quarters than to invest in the transition to new technology. They’ve had their chances. Over and over.
Fuck it then. Ditch ‘em
Chinese imports 1) would bankrupt american industry, and 2) wouldnt solve it anyway because this is not one and done. Like really, this is not a small or simple thing. We need massive industry to solve this, the entire world needs to switch. There is enough demand for all countries to ramp up (or switch over) their own companies.
China had 1) pollution out the ass, they knew they needed it, and 2) new companies. In the grand scheme of things they are still ramping up their car ownership levels. So they had the choice of a) making a new ICE plant which would eventually switch to EV anyway, or b) a new EV plant The choice was simple.
So he's too incompetent to have done both? Why did we tolerate him running for re-election?
This is a presidential order, IRA was an act of congress. This drilling ban could have been done immediately, and either way, IRA would have taken years to get through congress
And we're back to "why didn't they do everything, everywhere, all at once?"
It’s as though you didn’t read my comment at all. I said the presidential order could have been done right away, and IRA would take awhile regardless given there were more steps involved (an act of congress)
Should last what two weeks?
Yeah if he did this 3-4 years ago, it would have made a dent, now it's nothing but virtue signaling.
It's complete virtue signaling. The amount of oil extracted from federal land has never been higher than in the past four years.
Average national cost of gasoline per gallon in the US (monthly average) first went over $3 nearly two decades ago. Today it's $3.07. The July 2006 average of $3.025/gallon would have the purchasing power of around $4.75 in today's dollars. What are people really thinking they should be paying for gasoline in a world that needs to be moving AWAY from using fossil fuels?
Seriously, we'd see a move away from massive SUVs in a heartbeat if Americans had to pay what we do in the UK for petrol. It's over twice as much here.
For some reason they think it's a right to take 3 tons of their own personal metal on a two hour round trip every day.
If only he had done this and prosecute Trump 3 goddamn years ago, maybe he wouldn't have lost!
... or you know, spend the last 3 years setting up a proper democrat candidate instead of getting in the way till the last minute.
Is it anything more than symbolic at this point considering Trump will be in office in 15 days?
Because he's going to immediately reverse it.
Why are we linking to a Republican rag to report on Democratic “policy”?
Because this is the sort of meaningless feel-good story that Bezos thinks his readers want as he turns The Washington Post into The New York Post.
Global warming averted forever!
Excellent. Let’s move on from oil.
Inb4 a random red state sues for loss of profits and 5th circuit blocks the motion.
My money is on Texas this time.
These memorandums, how legally robust are they? Will Trump just be able to turn them over?
Apparently no https://youtu.be/SGwc5jWnhM8
if I do something good on my way out maybe history won't remember me for enabling the genocide of Palestine.
instead of prohibiting leasing, which will be immediately overturned, he should lease them to a conservation trust for 99 years. you know ... if he was serious.
Ok do genocide next
In my opinion we're doing more than enough genocide already, don't you think?
Nelson: Ha-ha
