U.S. News

2447 readers

61 users here now

News about and pertaining to the United States and its people.

Please read what's functionally the mission statement before posting for the first time. We have a narrower definition of news than you might be accustomed to.

Guidelines for submissions:

Post the original source of information as the link.
If there is any Nazi imagery in the linked story, mark your post NSFW.
Advocating violence is not allowed on Beehaw in general.
If there is a paywall, provide an archive link in the body.
Post using the original headline; edits for clarity (as in providing crucial info a clickbait hed omits) are fine.
Social media is not a news source.

For World News, see the News community.

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

alyaza@beehaw.org

rs5th@beehaw.org

Powderhorn@beehaw.org

CDC orders mass retraction and revision of submitted research across all science and medicine journals. Banned terms must be scrubbed. (Including gender, transgender, pregnant person, LGBT, and more) (insidemedicine.substack.com)

submitted 5 months ago by floofloof@lemmy.ca to c/usnews@beehaw.org

11 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 12 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Shawdow194@fedia.io 20 points 5 months ago

On 6 May 1933, the Institute of Sexology, an academic foundation devoted to sexological research and the advocacy of homosexual rights, [transgender people, and women,] was broken into and occupied by Nazi-supporting youth. Several days later the entire contents of the library were removed and burned. The institute was initially occupied by The German Student Union, who were a collective of Nazi-supporting youth. Several days later, on 10 May, the entire contents of the library were removed to Berlin’s Bebelplatz Square. That night, along with 20,000 other books across Germany, they were publicly burned in a symbolic attack by Nazi officials on their enemies.

[–] Rivalarrival@lemmy.today 16 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Wasn't this the plot of a book?

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 9 points 5 months ago

Ministry of Truth (Social) seal of approval.

[–] LukeZaz@beehaw.org 10 points 5 months ago (1 children)

For those worried this research would be lost, it has apparently already been saved as part of a bulk archive by an r/DataHoarder user.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 5 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

That's good. We should all seed the torrent.

Magnet link

[–] Crotaro@beehaw.org 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Good idea, I'll try to get a torrent client working on my Raspberry Pi for these types of documents.

Edit: Set up qBitTorrent and am downloading and then seeding it. Thanks for the tip! According to a reviewer, you want to use this link instead, because the autogenerated one has some missing files?

Reviewer: chilimachine - favoritefavoritefavoritefavoritefavorite - February 3, 2025

Subject: Use full-20250128-cdc-datasets-USETHIS.torrent file in the file list

If you're seeding made sure to use the torrent file named "full-20250128-cdc-datasets-USETHIS.torrent" instead of IA's auto-generated one. The auto-gen one is missing files and a bit buggy.

[–] its_me_xiphos@beehaw.org 10 points 5 months ago

I am begging anyone on this sub, begging. Help me get FEMA data. It is just as vital. Please.

[–] notabot@lemm.ee 8 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Would the journals be under any obligation to accept these bad-faith revisions or retractions?

[–] Midnitte@beehaw.org 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The for-profit journals that are asking for more money, your asking what might motivate them?

[–] notabot@lemm.ee 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

They already have the money for the original paper, do they charge for retractions? I don't know, but I'd assumed not.

[–] Midnitte@beehaw.org 2 points 5 months ago

I'm sure they'd love to charge more for retractions.