this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2025
183 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

72360 readers
2763 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LongLive@lemmy.world 38 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I hope that this won't mean there will be more advertising in protected areas because it satisfies new requirements.

[–] singletona@lemmy.world 38 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Narrator: It means there will be more advertising in protected areas because it satisfies new requirements.

[–] jdeath@lemm.ee 7 points 4 months ago

thinking about advertisers, this is the only possible reason why they would adopt such expensive technology

[–] Someonelol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 4 months ago

That would go great as a rotating poster setup for home decoration.

[–] badbytes@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago (1 children)

More targeted advertising, just what humanity needed.

[–] jdeath@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago

and! it only costs as much resources as ten million paper posters, but will break after getting rained on thrice

[–] punkcoder@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago

Finally a size / resolution that wont make comics look like garbage.

[–] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago (3 children)

What's wrong with just a paper poster?

[–] DrCake@lemmy.world 27 points 4 months ago (2 children)

For the company, saves having to send someone out to replace it, instead just update it over 3G or whatever

[–] otacon239@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago (1 children)

In the article it also points out that this means you don’t have to waste paper, which is a plus, assuming they last.

[–] jdeath@lemm.ee 3 points 4 months ago

i reckon they can handle getting rained on at least three times! and they love the summer sun

[–] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 12 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Plus you can use real time bidding and let customers fight each other for prime hours, while also keeping low interest spots working.

That said, I guess we're closing in to those Minority Report street adds, that scan your face and give you personalized adverts.

[–] jdeath@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago

yeah i saw those in development over 10 years ago. they are definitely getting close

[–] jqubed@lemmy.world 20 points 4 months ago

This is more to replace the digital signs that currently use LCD/LED displays. It’s more readable in the daytime because it doesn’t need a ridiculously bright backlight to compete against the sun. Compared to those signs this uses dramatically less electricity because it only uses electricity when the image changes (reading the article some of the options run off a small battery pack like you could use to recharge your phone a few times). Iirc you also don’t really have burn-in issues with e-ink. It looks like their color reproduction has gotten a lot better with the latest generation, so this could be a really good fit for a lot of outdoor digital signs.

[–] jdeath@lemm.ee -2 points 4 months ago

requires paying humans wages and that is unacceptable! also it only costs ten million times more than a paper poster and it goes into CapEx not OpEx so the government gives it preferential tax treatment