yeah the party of insider trading will definitely be the workers' party if you wish it hard enough.
this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2025
586 points (97.4% liked)
politics
24897 readers
2624 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Can't be the party of wall st and the party of workers, at best you can pay lip service to one or the other, its no wonder which they would choose
Ignorant Dutchman here:
What's stopping anyone from starting a new Workers' party in the US? A multi party system seems more favorable than its current state.
load more comments
(3 replies)
As a non American, I've been told by an American colleagues that the Republicans are traditionally the worker's party. Could someone please clarify?
Additionally, my opinion is that the entire system needs to be abolished to allow representation from more than two parties to represent how diverse America is.
How far back are they talking "traditionally"? You can make an argument that they were a century ago. Not a particularly strong argument, but there's an argument. Go back even further, and Karl Marx himself was congratulating Abraham Lincoln. After all, slaves are the most exploited workers.
The last 50 years, though? Absolutely not, but their bleating about "coastal elites" hoodwinks a lot of people to think otherwise.
Yes! My colleagues were talking about the elites in California when they mentioned that.
Because they're jealous of a state that isn't a shit hole
Source: Californian with family in a red state: if you're close enough to them they'll admit it unknowingly
I think that all makes sense. A state government that wants to improve the working class will generally be more rich, and a state that doesn't will have more poor.
Nice. When another debate comes up in the office, I'll have some ammo
I would really like to know why your American colleagues think that.
Probably briefly remembering high school talking about Republicans doing good things, and then thinking Fox News is accurate reporting.
Their words were something to the effect of Democrats always campaigning with celebrities and supported by rich people, while Republicans are supported by the poor and don't campaign with rich people (I did point out Musk to them and they replied that Musk is a hard worker etc.).
Thanks for the follow up. The notion is totally at odds with their actions and efforts, and it's kind of disheartening to hear their reasoning. I shouldn't be surprised though.
Tldr: Democrats were the party of the South until the 90s
Alabama, for example, didn't elect a Republican governor until 1986. Mississippi didn't elect one until 1991. Georgia didn't elect one until 2002.
Claims Nixon was the Republican who came up with the idea of pandering to racists
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/1976_United_States_presidential_election
See Jimmy Carter’s support in the South
load more comments
(4 replies)
But then the corporations are not going to pay them.
Joe Biden was extremely left leaning for the average American. He did so many pro union things. He held an EV summit and didn't invite Tesla, because they didn't have a union. First president to cross a picket line. https://uwua.net/2023/10/president-bidens-union-record/ Democrat platforms have always been in the direction of higher taxes on the rich to fund more social safety nets. People just don't like them because they aren't good enough. When the alternative is explicitly anti-worker, anti-union, tax cuts for the rich, destroy social safety nets. This narrative needs to die. It's not a failure of democrat policies or platform it's just a failure of the media environment. It is purely a media problem. Democrats just need to start shitting out more tik toks and get more sycophantic youtubers like trump has, to jerk them off so the vibes shift.
load more comments
(7 replies)
Just let the DFL take over nationally
Ken Martin is now the chair of the national Democratic party. He was the leader of the DFL.
He also doesn't seem to be moving the party in any useful direction. Congrats on getting your monkeys paw wish I guess?
load more comments
(1 replies)
I don't know why these articles keep coming up, because the party at large already was. One or two turds in the punchbowl do kind of ruin ones appetite I suppose, but when you're up against a fascist ideology completely based on lies and bullshit social posturing as issues, you can't rely on something like being the "worker party" to combat.
Democrats need to fucking smarter and more nimble at turning the tables on lies and misinformation. That's what we need. They're fucking failing at that right now.
Are you so blind to the fact that a bipartisan system cannot possibly represent the people. The Democrats haven't driven politics for the working man for a long fucking while...
load more comments
(4 replies)
A two party system isn't it and this can be the best time to start a new party, one that focuses on the worker's not to say this party would completely destroy help for the wealthy but make them do what's fair for living and operating in this country.