This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.
The original was posted on /r/nanocurrency by /u/LogicalPotato3648 on 2025-06-26 15:29:45+00:00.
Nano is significantly different from other cryptocurrencies. Cryptocurrencies like ETH remind me of quicksand. When the developers designed the cryptocurrency, their goal was quite clear, but over time it turned out to be ineffective for everyday use (slow, dirty, not scalable, too high fees). And so they start inventing other levels where complexity in use begins to appear, if convenience, then decentralization suffers (like centralized wallets). And the more they move, the further they move away from the goal for which it all began, namely decentralization, ease of use, convenient, fast transfer of value and information. If we're talking about smart contracts, then in my opinion it should be some kind of separate application, some kind of separate platform where there will be account balances that will automatically execute a pre-defined contract. The problem with ETH developers is that they saw that BTC was not perfect and tried to combine everything into ETH, the shortcomings of the first and second are known to everyone. If they now come out and say that they were wrong and went the wrong way, the ETH rate will fall almost to 0. They needed to focus on one thing, either efficient transactions or decentralized applications. "Do one thing, but do it well." In the future, all their 2,3,4 levels will still be worse than the innovative solutions and applications of the future. ETH developers and their hopes to combine this are like a sore on their leg that they have no way of getting rid of, because they will lose everything. But time will tell. Correct me if you disagree.