this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2025
833 points (98.2% liked)

Fuck Cars

13688 readers
155 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dan69@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

What you actually need are walkable cities, transit (trains/buses) friendly neighborhoods, that would make it easy for people.

[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Yeah, their comment is a joke, but it does mention real things that are real problems with our food supply chain. Some of which could be mitigated by growing locally. Because somebody at some point made a problem with vehicles, and they "solved" it with vehicles.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Being that stupid isn't natural. You know they do the opposite of reading a book and putsome efforts to lower their IQ that much.

The human brain uses a lot of calories; maybe he's so concerned about this that he turns it off before going online

[–] CameronDev@programming.dev 6 points 2 months ago

I have personally wondered about that. Not in a car vs cyclist thing, but cyclist vs public transport.

Not even sure how to do the math on it.

Still, both are surely way better than driving.

[–] LavaPlanet@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago

Haha lol, assuming people in cars count calories and or operate on minimal / in a deficit. Regardless of the car argument, people riding bikes are more likely to be counting calories and in a calorie deficit, as they're more health conscious. People driving cars wouldn't care as much, on average, and would consume more calories than necessary, probably triple the "cycling" extra calorie needs. Omfg. I could debate either side, if I had to, that's the stupidest take I've ever heard. It holds absolutely no water. Where's the data showing people in cars consume less food / calories.

[–] Njos2SQEZtPVRhH@piefed.social 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

I am Dutch, have 0 cars, 2 bicycles, and I'm perfectly happy with it. I've only recently came across the first situation in which I felt like car access would be usefull.

A couple I'm friends with were pregnant and they don't have a car either, but since they wanted to be able to go to the hospital quickly and indepently, they rented a car for a week or so. This would't work for me because I don't have a drivers license. People often ask me 'but what if you need to do this or that...' and never do I feel like they're pointing towards a problem that I have. Just some minor inconvenience, if one at all. But in this case I thought, yeah if my wife were pregnant it would be damn usefull to be able to transport her by car, by myself. If it ever happens I'm sure we'll find a solution though. But I found it interesting that it was only the first situation in which it actually seemed usefull to me to have car access.

[–] HerbSolo@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Yeah, if you bring up cycling, all of a sudden everybody needs to transport a fridge to another town in the rain.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 5 points 2 months ago

Skill issue.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] withabeard@feddit.uk 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I wonder if in a society such as yours, where this is all more common.

Could you have taxi companies that take a small fee up front to guarantee you a rapid taxi to hospital when the time comes. I'll assume ambulances are fine for accidents and emergencies. A regular taxi (and the wait) is fine for unexpected trips where you are unable to cycle for some reason.

But a reasonable fee to say, I want a "rapid" taxi for this instance.

[–] bluesheep@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think that "reasonable fee" would be a quite high one. You're basically asking someone to be available 24/7 for a specified period of time. And besides, depending on where the person is when you call them it might actually be quicker to just call a cab.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago

I'm pretty sure overweight tommy incel the reddit mod eats more than twice what I eat and has never touched a bike in his life

[–] RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com 4 points 2 months ago

This actually would be an interesting study.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›