this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2025
717 points (96.0% liked)

memes

17681 readers
2518 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The race may already be lost, but still.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Entertainmeonly@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Remember boys and girls, a 4 out of 5 star review on any platform that doesn't allow a zero star, is only a 75% grade. Not an 80% like these hucksters imply. Thats a solid C, not a B. Let's not give in to this corporate delusion anymore

3-5 = 50% =/= 60%

2-5 =25% =/= 40%

It's a false show of satisfaction in the very least. A rotting manifestation of the soulless corporation not allowing any amount of transparency stop them from pulling the curtain closed tighter, on the, "oh fuck," side.

I think they are actually aware the curtains are silk and quite see through. I think we can all agree we've crossed the event horizon. Everything is going to get pulled in soon.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Hm. Probably a decent idea. I’m sure people view ratings very differently amongst themselves.

I almost never give 3 stars. If it’s 3, it should probably be a 2 or 1.

5-excellent, no problems.

4-some very minor concerns, but otherwise the product does what it’s supposed to.

3-?

2-Issues interfering with the expected/full use of the product. Failure of product right out of warranty. Likely seeking tech help or a refund.

1-DOA/not as described/died soon/immediate RMA

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 3 points 1 month ago

No problems isn't excellent.

No problems is what I expect. It should be ordinary. Excellence means they went over and above.

[–] yoriaiko@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 month ago

Give 5 stars to this comment or I report You for any other score as harassment!

Also I add extra gifts for any 5 star ratings!

Corrupted, it is all corrupted.

[–] devfuuu@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

People use it like the one on the top? Never knew about it and never realized. These kind of ratings kinda have personal definitions in each ones head, so not like people even talk about it. I'm pretty sure I rarely gave anything 5 stars in my life.

[–] marzhall@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Honestly I wish rating systems just gave me a vertical line to place somewhere on a bell curve. Make it obvious I'm comparing against the average.

But as it is, because drivers etc. get punished for anything less than a 5, it's 5 stars

[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

the top scheme has 5/5 and the bottom one 4/5, so now we know which is better

[–] randint@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 6 points 1 month ago

This is how it works in Japan. An average of 4 stars on Google Map (for food places, at least) is considered pretty good. There's also another Japanese site dedicated for restaurants (Tabelog), where restaurants with more than 3.5 stars only make up 3%. Only 0.07% restaurants have more than 4 stars.

[–] MrFinnbean@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Small secret.

When companies compare performances they see only three categories. 0-1 star reviews are bad. 2-3 are okay. 4-5 are great.

This is because in the end the well written review you gave to the product after testing it for 100 hours and gave the product 4 stars because of the minor flaws is pretty much the same as some randomass teens hype review 5 stars.

In the end you both liked it and there is no urgent need to fix anything.

As a consumer you should just trust to the wisdom of the crowd to tell truth.

[–] LockheedTheDragon@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Capitalism tries to get as much out of their employees as possible. Meaning employees fear of losing your job of you don't get the highest rating. And if you are in the USA that means losing benefits and quickly running out of money. Give employees the highest rating, unless it actually bad, because they are forced to live in capitalism.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] OmegaMouse@pawb.social 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

When it comes to rating products, it seems like there's an expectation to give 5 stars. I guess because there's a sense of not only rating the product, but also the seller - and you'd feel guilty not giving full marks if the product arrived ok and did what it was advertised to do.

In terms of movies/books/games, 4 stars is my default for a piece of media I really enjoyed. 5 stars I'd only give to stuff I believe is near perfect. If I see a book that averages 3.8 to 4 stars online I know it's gonna be great. Anything beyond that is either incredible, or just hasn't had enough reviews yet!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Four stars always just means some people gave one star for shipping issues unrelated to the product.

[–] Jerb322@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

⭐️⭐️⭐️

[–] TheFriendlyDickhead@feddit.org 4 points 1 month ago

The problem is that most people rate the first way. If a place has a rating of a 4.5 and I thought they were pretty good, but not perfect, so they deserve 4 stars, I am not going to rate them. Having 4 stars is usually considered not that good, so lowering their score is not what I want to accomplish as 4.5 is pretty fitting in the context most people have. That leads me to giving 5 stars relativley often and not rating ok or just good places at all.

[–] snugglesthefalse@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

If I get asked to rate something it's probably going to be a 4 or a 3 unless it's bad, 5 means as good as it can be and unless a 6 gets added then it's unrealistic to give a 5

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] buttnugget@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

It’s the kind of thing that honestly should be regulated.

[–] UncleGrandPa@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Perfection is a goal,

Not a default

[–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

But "ok" implies "some issues".

[–] Coffeephilic@lemmy.cafe 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I disagree. To me, "ok" means adequate and unremarkable.

[–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Yeah, that makes sense actually. Looking at it again, that's not really the problem. "Bad" is the direct opposite of "Good", they should be at symmetrical spots of the spectrum. Both versions have it wrong. If Bad is the worst rating, Good should be the best. I still say get rid of "some issues," it just sounds too benign to me for the second-worst possible rating, change it to "bad" and make 1/5 stars Terrible or something equally inversely comparable with "Exceptional".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago

⭐ ⭐ ⭐ ⭐ ⭐ Timely delivery of my 1972 Volkswagon clutch plates, will order again

Sir, this is a USB cable...

[–] Jordan117@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not everywhere! This fucks over anybody who depends on ratings for job evals.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 3 points 1 month ago

I also struggle with people liberally handing out "11/10" for "great" and go up to 12 for "awesome".

My scale for "great" is 8, "awesome" is 9 and 10 is reserved for really special things (greay by itself + some additional bonus).

I always feel weird, like I'm overly critical, when someone else says "Oh this is great, I love this, 11/10" and I feel the same but only hand out 8.7/10.

[–] shadejinx@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

A long time ago I adopted the Jinx's Rating For All Things system and it's served me very well. It is very similar to OPs suggestion.

  • ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️: This thing is core to who I am. I don't want to live in a world without it. The experience was life changing.
  • ⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️: I really like this thing! This will be in my rotation for along time. I had an amazing time!
  • ⭐️⭐️⭐️: I like it. Perfect in the background. If it's on, I probably will watch/listen, but I probably won't seek it out. Inoffensive. This meets but doesn't exceed my expectations.
  • ⭐️⭐️: Not my thing, but I see why people like it. It has value, just not to me. I was slightly annoyed.
  • ⭐️: Why would anyone like this thing?!?!?!?

I personally think the 5-star rating system is perfect. Any more than that and a lot of the mid-tier ratings become arbitrary and everything is subject to immediacy bias. Tastes change over time and how much you like stuff changes, but I've found that they rarely change buckets in this system.

I don't understand why someone cares if they like one thing "just a little bit more" than another. It doesn't have to be a competition. Do you like it or do you love it? Is it core to understanding you as a person? Did you have an amazing time?

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›