MX Linux XFCE is great for tiny drives. I've successfully run it on multiple 16GB systems, with space to spare.
Linux Questions
Linux questions Rules (in addition of the Lemmy.zip rules)
- stay on topic
- be nice (no name calling)
- do not post long blocks of text such as logs
- do not delete your posts
- only post questions (no information posts)
Tips for giving and receiving help
- be as clear and specific
- say thank you if a solution works
- verify your solutions before posting them as facts.
Any rule violations will result in disciplinary actions
yeah I was also thinking that. a light weight distro with like XFCE or just a barebones WM like DWM or Sway or whatever. It doesn't need to do much, just run a couple things. so slapping KDE or even GNOME on it would be overkill.
NixOS disk consumption is really bad unless you're going to keep it very minimal. On top of that, rebuilding takes a lot of computational power and RAM, so it would be very slow unless you remotely rebuild your laptop from the dedicated server. I have a small server (1GB RAM, so it's even worse), and I can't rebuild on that server without thrashing.
But if it is just going to be used as a second display, I can see it working. Maybe build an ISO image from config, and installing that would work well.
yeah it's not going to be used for much. I was just thinking a browser like QuteBrowser, maybe Krita if it can do it, Wezterm, and of course remoting into on my main laptop so I can use it as a virtual second screen. that's it.
So maybe another distro would be a smarter choice? like just a barebones Arch?
That sort of sounds minimal, though I would worry more about the desktop environment. It shouldn't take too long to try it out from the way it sounds, and I would bail the moment I see "no space left" error. Arch is pretty light, so yeah, I would go with that.