this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2025
885 points (99.3% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

14056 readers
505 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Jason Bassler | @JasonBassler1

Big Brother just got an upgrade.

Starting December, Amazon’s Ring cameras will scan and recognize faces. Don’t want to be in their database? Too bad — walk past a Ring and your face can be stored, tagged, & analyzed without consent.

One step closer to total surveillance.

[Image: A Ring doorbell camera mounted on a brick wall. A digital overlay shows facial recognition scanning a person's face with grid lines. Text on the right reads "Amazon's Ring Adds Facial Recognition to Home Security" with additional text below.]

6:00 PM | Oct 4, 2025

Source: https://x.com/JasonBassler1/status/1974640686419857516

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FalseTautology@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Can't we make necklaces of intense IR radiation that block out our faces? Or does that not work anymore?

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

A balaklava and a can of spray paint would be cheaper and more effective.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] StopSpazzing@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I was discussing this on another post, of using a 5w invisible laser to burn sensors, with auto focal point distance sensor + ai camera detection, to render them useless but there is a ton of dangers to doing this.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

Nah, Project Farm tested a bunch of doorbells out, most of them still worked surprisingly well even with a flashlight pointed directly at them in the dark.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Highlandcow@feddit.uk 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Pray this isn't legal in the UK, under GDPR i don't think so but I'm not sure

[–] Magnum@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago (3 children)

GDPR states that saving personal data without consent is illegal and on top you have the right to be deleted and forgotten. I am not even allowed to have a none recording camera sending the image from in front of my door because the space in front of my door is not my private property.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cdf12345@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Pretty sure this will be illegal in Illinois too

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago

The problem is Amazon has this. I don lt care if my neighbors do this. But random corporations should not be involved.

"One step closer?" Good one. Total surveillance is already here and has been for a while.
This Ring fuckery just makes it even more convenient for ~~fascists~~ law enforcement to find you.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Reading the ring press release, I have to admit the features look useful. I wouldn’t mind a better way to know whether it’s someone I care about before I bother checking. Most unexpected doorbell ringers are solicitors that I don’t want to waste time with

They’re also coming out in December and there is not yet a way to disable that feature for privacy.

For those who care about their own privacy walking down the street …. Unless houses are very tight to the street, you should be more concerned with the higher resolution models also being released. We did have an incident where police asked me if I would check the camera and not only could I not identify the person, it was hard to tell they were a person (the idiots said “oh that was us, based on jacket color”) but my point is that with the limited resolution of current cameras, no one is identifying you unless you get pretty close. And it’s much worse at night. The new high resolution models may change that

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yeah manipulative corporate propaganda makes their product sound great, useful and perfectly safe and normal. Why would you even bother reading that? It's anti-information and rots the brain.

My face is in all the databases, sadly.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›