this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2025
442 points (96.2% liked)

Technology

76219 readers
2798 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

It's under a paywall for some, so here's the archived version.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 27 points 1 day ago

I hope its all busted or out of date stuff to begin with otherwise its as stupid as the book burning.

[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 15 points 1 day ago

misguided. people should be against corporations as they are the ones who make technology a problem.

[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 45 points 2 days ago

I would have never guessed the iPad babies would turn on their cyber nannies. Good on you, kiddos.

[–] Newsteinleo@midwest.social 134 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Geodad@lemmy.world 63 points 2 days ago (9 children)
[–] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Fuck yes. Especially printers.

But my IT guy advice on the matter is this: ink jet is a scam, don't buy one, ever; don't accept one for free. If you print a lot, get a laser printer for home, if you only print a few times a year, get a laser printer for home.

[–] FunnyUsername@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I got a 90$ laser printer for home 5 years ago. I've printed at least 600 pieces of paper, and have only had to change the toner cartridge once (recently). I can get a 2 pack of toner for about 24$.

This is how i think about printing now: i needed some black paper in a pinch once, so i printed a solid black image on both sides of a sheet of paper.

laser all the way

[–] Limonene@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Inkjet printers are good for furry artists who sell prints at conventions. Hmm... that's actually so specific that it reinforces your point.

[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago (4 children)

PC Load Letter?! The fuck does that mean?

[–] ChapulinColorado@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

That brought back some printer PTSD

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 179 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (9 children)

Appstinence is just one of a seemingly growing constellation of groups, mostly led by young people, advocating for reduced reliance on technology, either for one's own mental health or as a protest against powerful tech companies that have an ever-growing hold on all aspects of our lives.

I'ma be real with you. Choosing to dump technology entirely instead of learning to use it responsibly and finding things that aren't dominated by corporations looking to control us seems really short sighted and leaning into false promise of things being different at best.

It's quite like the whole Climate Change movement and how we won't do anything to constrain giant corporations or billionaires in how they impact the planet, but instead individuals (often poverty stricken) are expected to shoulder the burden through recycling programs that don't even end up recycling what those individuals take the time to sort.

It's also eerily similar to the anti-AI movement which focuses on all the most negative aspects of AI generation, ignores the benefits of locally-hosted models as opposed to giant models owned by corporations run out of energy and water hogging data-centers, and similarly ignores that the AI that consistently is a failure is general purpose AI whereas highly specialized AI is often very successful. I am by no means an AI lover, I don't use it at all in my every day life, but I think it's foolhardy to write it off entirely instead of making regulations that prevent this kind of environment-destroying investment in endless data centers for profit. Much like the Climate Change issue, it's the smallest and weakest among us shouldering the burden, making our own lives harder, while nothing materially changes and AI advances anyway.

These modern Luddites are not wrong that some aspects of the modern era are terrible, but some of the things they decry are the same things that are so beautiful about it. When I was a young person, finding LGBTQ+ or atheist groups was basically impossible without the internet. As someone who grew up in a relatively rural area, it was hard to make friends and connections even in a mostly unconnected world (I am in my forties, for reference, so I grew up in the era of CompuServe and AOL being the only "online" options). Having the internet suddenly opened me up to finding people who I could actually be open and vulnerable with, something I couldn't say was true about most of my IRL peers at the time. Returning to that, especially at a period where Christofascism is taking hold, is asking to let the Christofascists dictate how society looks and functions and removing those footholds of access for people who are queer or atheist or disabled. It returns us to an unconnected world where people suffer in silence for decades not knowing that there is nothing wrong with who they are deep down as they are regularly shamed and abused by their IRL peers for not appearing or acting the "right" way.

Especially with the likelihood of modern communication methods being clamped down upon, embracing the technology and finding ways to use it to benefit humankind instead of deciding it's all evil is the way forward. The world was, for example, a better place with Fred Rogers in it, who leveraged the technology of television, often villainized as terrible for children, as a way to connect with children and educate them in a healthy, humane, and loving way. I see shades of that type of villainization in this movement, equating screen time with being unhealthy.

All tools are able to be misused. All tools are able to be used positively. It's all in who is using those tools and what their aims and intents are. A hammer can be used to both create and destroy in positive ways in the trade of construction. A hammer can also be wielded as a violent, dangerous weapon. It all depends on whose hands it is in, and what they aim to use that tool for.

Dropping technology instead of standing for using it in positive ways will always be tantamount to throwing the baby out with the bathwater.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Aggravationstation@feddit.uk 42 points 2 days ago (10 children)

Paywalled article. Pretty fucking apt.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Integrate777@discuss.online 82 points 2 days ago (12 children)

I'm a fan of taking back control over my tech, not giving up control. They're treating it like there's no other option.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 34 points 2 days ago (6 children)

For every second you have your headphones in on the train, you're not talking to anybody and you're not taking in the world. For every one of those seconds, how much of your life do you let pass by?" one man asked.

Lmao what the fuck

[–] nightlily@leminal.space 4 points 1 day ago

I think Germans would prefer if I stabbed them than talked to them on the train.

[–] ArsonButCute@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 2 days ago (76 children)

Its a call to be present.

There is nothing inherently wrong with wearing headphones on the train, but ask yourself why you're doing it.

If you put on Headphones to keep people from talking to you, you're making the choice to opt out of the human experience.?Make that choice every day on a 45 minute commute and after only a week 7.5 hours where you've opted out of chance encounter, conversation, possibly meeting a new friend or partner. It might not be a bad idea to make the choice to NOT disconnect, actively choosing to engage in the world around us makes a huge difference in how we percieve it, and how it percieves us.

An experiment I'd suggest, if you're the type to default to using your phone as an idle activity:

Next time you're idle and get the urge to pull out your phone, instead look around you and find the most interesting thing you can see. Why is it interesting? Is there anything abnormal about it? Is it's place significant? Take that and note it in your mind, have a conversation with a coworker about it later. Then take note, how did this pointless conversation make me feel?

Being present by choice, especially if done often, will create chances to engage with the World, and its inhabitants.

The other day someone told me life was boring. Put the phone down, make more than the 2 meter cone you can see from around your phone visible, and you'll find the World has a lot of engagement to offer.

load more comments (76 replies)
[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago

Well I consider talking to strangers in public a waste of time, so what now?

[–] expr@programming.dev 10 points 2 days ago

Sounds like a pretty legitimate question.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ordnance_qf_17_pounder@reddthat.com 45 points 2 days ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›