This is preposterous. Have we used that adjective yet?
this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2025
168 points (100.0% liked)
politics
26136 readers
3759 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Seems like something a judge would decide, not the president. It’s blatant corruption that they’re even considering it anyway.
And more generally, that the beneficiary decides their own benefits. I mean this is the mother of all conflicts of interest.
Not to mention, he’s not owed shit. He was prosecuted for a reason and the only reason it failed was corrupt judges and a weak justice system. He’s guilty and should be in prison right now, not president.
"You are all going to pay me a lot but that's a sacrifice I'm willing to make"
The kid has the keys to the cookie jar. This couldn't possible go wrong.
Good thing they fired that ethics overseer
He's saying clearly, he can cut a check to himself. With taxpayer money. It's all kosher. Right?
The weird thing about this story is that after finding Crypto, it seems Trump is not hurting for money anymore. Not only is he sitting on a pile of shitty tokens, but the smart contracts governing those tokens constantly funnel money his way. Recent disclosures indicate that he and his family own $5 billion just in WLFI, and that doesn't count other crypto scams like the NFTs and such.
So, by all accounts, he doesn't really need this money anymore. Still, he will push to take as much as possible, just out of spite. Whether or not he actually broke any laws doesn't factor into his thinking. He is out for revenge, pure and simple. And Republicans in Congress will let him grab them by the pussy, because they want a piece of it.
Remember the morons applauding his good character, his generosity, and his incorruptibility when he said he wouldn't take the Presidential salary because he wasn't doing this for money. Just to be clear, that salary is 400k/yr. $230 million is 575 years worth of Presidential salary. Even if the presidential salary had always been 400k since George Washington's first term, Trump would be taking more than twice the money ever paid out to all presidents combined with this one payment. For the offense of... being investigated. For justified suspicion of, and even verified in some cases, crimes and corruption. Jesus H Fucking Christ.
Weirdly enough, that "privately funded" ballroom they're building is almost $230m. You know, the one Trump said he'd build and pay for himself?
Can we piss in his new ballroom when it's finished?
You can, but you won’t be the first.
You would have thought that deciding the amount of taxpayer money to spend on yourself is the essence of corruption but then the man is the definition of corruption.
#NOKINGS
#KILLALLHITLERS
I think this should be deferred until after he's out of office.
Or at least until after he's dead
But Biden/Obama did it.