this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2025
414 points (99.3% liked)

News

33120 readers
2240 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] finitebanjo@piefed.world 48 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Gorsh, if only the FAA had more employees. Did the FAA use to have more employees? What happened to them? /sarcasm

[–] BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Honestly, I wonder how long til we have to close down an airport because staff just stops showing up entirely. I feel like absenteeism has to have gone exponential.

With the expense of flights, I also do think a lot about whether or not this disproportionately affects demographics who were more likely to have voted for Trump.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Wait......you think the vast majority of trump voters are wealthy?

Uhhhhhh........I don't even know how to respond to that without feeling like I'm talking down to you.

[–] finitebanjo@piefed.world 9 points 6 days ago

It can disproportionately affect them without most of them being wealthy.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 3 points 6 days ago

Wealthy people will be less affected. They will get a different flight and just charge it. Poorer people will need to wait for a refund or insurance to pay to get an alternative.

I would also expect that the workers in states with less social benefits are more likely to have the staff not show up as they have to earn money elsewhere.

[–] RedMari@reddthat.com 4 points 6 days ago

You don't think they will find a way to blame Biden?

[–] 800XL@lemmy.world 38 points 6 days ago (2 children)
[–] CatAssTrophy@safest.space 16 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Upvoted you, but they frequently fly out of smaller/private airports that don't have direct ATC control anyway, so it's unlikely that's a significant contributor to a solution. Though I definitely agree it should be done at whatever scale it can be to improve general conditions.

[–] SpermHowitzer@sh.itjust.works 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Most of the airports that private jets fly in and out of do have a tower. Also, there’s a lot of ground holds recently due to en route controller shortages which limits how much traffic can be in the air, which of course affects private jets as well.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] flynnguy@programming.dev 2 points 5 days ago

I'd imagine a lot of private jets do fly IFR though which does involve ATC. So even if they fly out of a non towered airport, they probably file their IFR plan with a towered airport and start talking to them once in the air.

[–] fritobugger2017@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago

Thanks for the laugh!

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 34 points 6 days ago (3 children)

I'm still trying to process the fact that a moron known for being on "The Real World" is Transportation Secretary. And it's been months.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 12 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

remember he also redirected his wifes flight away from the affected areas during the doge cuts of the atc.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 6 days ago

Everything is just so. Fucking. Stupid.

[–] arin@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Idk what the real world means in this context.

[–] mrnarwall@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

The Real World is an ongoing reality show on MTV. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy was in the 1997 season that took place in Boston Massachusetts.

[–] tyranical_typhon@lemmings.world 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I'm not sure either, but I assume it's a TV show.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 3 points 6 days ago

It was one of the first "reality TV" shows and naturally, it was completely fabricated.

In America, anyway, a lot of people seem to think that "reality TV" began with Survivor for whatever reason. I don't really understand this collective amnesia, since Cops (1989) and The Real World (1992) are both things that predated Survivor (2000), were on the air when Survivor started, and are still going...

Apparently, the first reality TV show credit goes to Candid Camera, which was on TV in 1948, and was predated by a show on radio in 1947. I have some vague memory of Candid Camera being on in the 70s or 80s, but I had no idea it went that far back.

[–] NRay7882@lemmy.world 18 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Take away pay from house & senate members while the government is shut down, they don't deserve the special treatment. Then we'll see how fast this all gets resolved.

[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

People keep suggesting this without thinking it through

Many congress members are quite wealthy. They could easily go without their salary at all, for their entire tenure. These people tend to make money off stock trading (at suspiciously high rates, but that's a different discussion), in addition to other investments and "consulting" generating revenue for them

There are, however, at least a few congress members that are not independently wealthy. Those members are actually working class and rely on their salary to live. Those people are the ones that will be squeezed without a paycheck

What do you think the end result of that will be?

The wealthy members of congress will be able to use shutdowns as a bludgeon to force the working class members to vote in line with them. The wealthy can hold out indefinitely. The working class can only hold out until rent is past-due

Long term, I'd expect to see two other knock-on effects. Working class members of congress will be heavily incentivized to start making very good stock picks to have backup income, or more outright corruption. The second effect would be a chilling effect on working class candidates even running for congress

Does that sound like a positive outcome? Are those the incentives you want in congress?

[–] NRay7882@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

We could have both, reform for leadership performing trades AND we can stop paying them when the government shuts down. But this story was about the FAA workers who don't get paid with stocks.

[–] Taldan@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

We could have both, reform for leadership performing trades AND we can stop paying them when the government shuts down

Okay, so we give a lot of power to the wealthy members of congress. It doesn't change the fundamental calculus that your suggestion would shift power from working class members of congress to the wealthy members. Even without insider trading, many of them are multi-millionaires and will not care at all that they don't receive their salary for a while

But this story was about the FAA workers who don’t get paid with stocks

That one has an easy solution that doesn't involve giving more power to the wealthy: Continue paying ATC during the shutdown

A much better generalized solution would instead to be forced budget continuation. Can't pass a bill? The old budget continues until you do

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Train the house and senate to do air traffuc control work.

[–] cannibalkitteh@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] Breezy@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago

But some how they are all Boeing planes.

[–] PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@lemmy.sdf.org 22 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Richest country on the fucking planet yet we ~~can't~~ won't pay ATC 🤦🤦🤦🤦🤦

[–] CatAssTrophy@safest.space 12 points 6 days ago

If we can't even hold the nation hostage, what's the point of authoritarian control?!

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

Paying people for work is just that "waste, fraud, and abuse" the Confederates kept babbling about.

[–] HotsauceHurricane@lemmy.world 22 points 6 days ago

I'm so glad I'm flying to one of the nations busiest airports next week.

[–] tyranical_typhon@lemmings.world 12 points 6 days ago

This can't be good for the economy.

load more comments
view more: next ›