this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2025
215 points (93.2% liked)

Technology

76918 readers
3105 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] melfie@lemy.lol 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I feel like this kind of thing can create a “Great Filter” situation. Tech seems to work well and most babies are genetically engineered now, but wait, why is everyone dying off before 30? Nope, it’s not the genetic engineering, and anyone who says that is a tinfoil hat wearer. Just look at all of these studies funded by big corporations and captured government agencies who have financial interests in its success—you’re not one of those anti-science idiots are you? Ok, actually, the data is in and it is the genetic engineering. Humanity is dying off, not reproducing fast enough, and will be extinct soon, but it made a bunch of billionaires even richer, so all good, right?

[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

If that were the case, wouldn’t the ones who didn’t get the genetic engineering be far more likely to reproduce and stride along with natural selection? I have a hard time seeing that event ever happening, short of the human population en mass deciding to engineer every baby on the planet before a single generation of which could have lived life and been studied for its effects.

What I think is more likely as a great filter is humans eventually settling on the idea that organic matter is really terrible medium for life. So, something with much more longevity, strength, efficiency, and brain power gets synthesized and we move in. At a certain point, wouldn’t biological life die off because life tends to yield to its more evolved forms? If us meat bags had to compete, how could we?

and I think there are more interesting answers to the Fermi Paradox than the Great Filter. For example, the expansion of space not being something we can overcome in travel. Or, maybe the way we perceive space is just so anthropic—we’re making poor assumptions about other beings.

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 25 points 2 days ago (18 children)

I'm not sure I get the universal negativity to this. Like sure, Altman sucks as a person, and an individual having enough money to significantly bankroll research like this is a sign of an economic failure, but surely curing or preventing genetic disease is just about the most uncontroversial use human genetic modification could have?

[–] qweertz@programming.dev 28 points 2 days ago

"What's bad with eugenics for the rich?"

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 6 points 2 days ago

Right. Currently the ways we avoid genetic disease are screening partners, screening IVF embryos, and in utero testing + abortion.

[–] mech@feddit.org 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

There's nothing uncontroversial about human genetic modification.
It's a pandora's box that just shouldn't be opened.

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago (3 children)

There's nothing uncontroversial about human genetic modification.
It's a pandora's box that just shouldn't be opened.

writes the person who isn't suffering because of a genetic disorder or met anybody suffering from a genetic disorder

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Because the US health care system already serves the wealthy and abandons the poor, any expensive treatments are seen as just further steps into a Gattaca future of even more dystopian disparity, especially when driven by a rich asshole personally.

Universal negativity is also kind of the norm around here. A lot of folks on Lemmy believe we are slaves sucking Satan’s cock for breakfast, and anything that isn’t a complete burn down of our system and way of life is a negative.

[–] Dojan@pawb.social 3 points 2 days ago

Bruh. I wish I was sucking Satan’s cock for breakfast. That at least implies some kind of reward coming down the line.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] ModernRisk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 2 days ago (2 children)

This really reminds me of “Brave New World”, kind of scary actually.

[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

And everyone already has the ability to pick their Soma

[–] hash@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 days ago

Shit, thanks for reminding me I'm scrolling instead of reading the copy in my bag.

[–] probable_possum@leminal.space 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Engineer some humans who can survive in zero gravity without peeing out their bone minerals. Humans who can survive hard radiation in space without having their cells crippled from destroyed DNA.

Maybe start with simple organisms. Like algae. :)

[–] makyo@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I’d just like to have to trim my nails less frequently

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I’d just like to have to trim my nails less frequently

i used to think like you, then i started (ab)using my hands for activities that wear them out. Now i'm glad that they're growing sufficiently fast to replace/renew

I see you've also purchased a new scratching post

load more comments (1 replies)

Know what? Fair. Good for them.

[–] Zier@fedia.io 9 points 2 days ago

If it works as good as AI, people will be chronic liars, have multiple fingers, and be annoying attention whores always asking if they can "help" you.

[–] BlackLaZoR@fedia.io 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I'm actually pro genetic engineering for this usecase. By expanding our medicine, we created an evolutionary problem: Carriers of genetic diseases keep passing their genes, passing the defects further. This will result in more and more health issues unless faulty genes themselves are fixed

[–] 123@programming.dev 3 points 1 day ago

There are more capable, actual medical professionals that can advance this field in a non-wallstreet all eggs in one basket kind of way.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] verdi@feddit.org 8 points 2 days ago

This is the usual front to further develop "designer baby" tech (which we already have, it's just the use is considered unethical). Mask investment as "saving the children" and altruistic to later flip the tech to billionaire friends so they can make little aryans on a d5 roll for a an AC of 1... Much like the open that turned for profit...

[–] goatinspace@feddit.org 7 points 2 days ago
[–] DFX4509B@lemmy.wtf 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

Oh hell no, don't bring Jurassic Park to the real world, please.

(JP did this with dinos, but this is the exact thing that movie warned about, just in this case with humans instead of dinos)

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 3 points 2 days ago

This guy can.

You know, everybody makes a idiot of himself as best as he can, and this guy can.

[–] gian@lemmy.grys.it 4 points 2 days ago

If (and is a really, really big if) this open the door to a better understanding of this type of pathologies and a way to somewhat cure them, I would say that it would be for the better.

But of course I am sure it will not end this way...

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›