this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2025
110 points (98.2% liked)

World News

50860 readers
1801 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/53408652

all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] survirtual@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Soy farming is destructive to natural ecosystems. A shame for the farmers in the US, but the nature will be glad and that is more valuable. It does depend on the replacement crop.

I am worried about Brazilian's nature with the increasing soy farming. Soy needs terrain that competes with beautiful native plants, and with increasing production, more land will be lost, and more water consumed.

The good news is that soy farming makes more sense in Brazil. Higher rainfall means less diverted water. It is actually more ecologically cost effective. Hopefully there will not be much more forest displacement.

[–] kiagam@lemmy.world 1 points 11 minutes ago

Soyf farming and cattle ranching have been destroying the amazon for decades. It is severely diminished from that. But it is such a huge forest that it seems infinite.

The bigger problem is that the soil on the amazon is actually pretty bad. There is a thin fertile layer that gets renewed by the forest. Once you cut it down to plant something else it quickly becomes bad, so you have to cut down more forest to keep up production

[–] jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works 15 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

US Farmers having the day they voted for:

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

They were voting for subsidies

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 1 points 29 minutes ago

They voted for what they got.

[–] tornavish@lemmy.cafe 19 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

US could always turn those soybeans into cheap food for the US.

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 14 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

Even give it away to starving families who lost their SNAP benefits during the shutdown.

But capitalists have to lie, çeat, & steal.

[–] tornavish@lemmy.cafe 4 points 7 hours ago (2 children)
[–] random_character_a@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Tax evasion, market manipulation, monopolies... etc.

[–] tornavish@lemmy.cafe 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

You got it right the first time.
Cha che chi cho chu = Ça çe çi ço çu.
English is such a shit language it changes “ea” to /ι/ in “cheat” /çιt/

[–] tornavish@lemmy.cafe 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

You seem reasonably proficient at it. I think you introduce misspellings like this on purpose—given your history. It’s a bit psychotic if you ask me—given your history…….

[–] b_tr3e@feddit.org -1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

What's the problem with "çeat"? Pretty obvious that it's pronounced "cheat". If you'd speak three languages or more, you'd be aware of that.Don't blame others for your eductional deficites.

[–] anguo@piefed.ca 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 35 minutes ago)

Pretty obvious that it’s pronounced “cheat”

French would like to disagree.

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 0 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] tornavish@lemmy.cafe 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Sha-eat?

Clearly English is your third language.

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 0 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

How do you pronouns “C”?
/ka/?

[–] AntiBullyRanger@ani.social 4 points 7 hours ago

Good. Make it forever.