this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2025
164 points (94.6% liked)

Technology

40769 readers
295 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Cars used to be entirely mechanical objects. With hard work and expertise, basically any old vehicle could be restored and operated: On YouTube, you can watch a man drive a 1931 Alvis to McDonald’s. But the car itself was stuck in time. If the automaker added a feature to the following year’s model, you just didn’t get it. Things have changed. My Model 3 has few dials or buttons; nearly every feature is routed through the giant central touch screen. It’s not just Tesla: Many new cars—and especially electric cars—are now stuffed with software, receiving over-the-air updates to fix bugs, tweak performance, or add new functionality.

In other words, your car is a lot like an iPhone (so much so that in the auto industry, describing EVs as “smartphones on wheels” has become a go-to cliché.) This has plenty of advantages—the improved navigation, the fart noises—but it also means that your car may become worse because the software is outdated, not because the parts break. Even top-of-the-line phones are destined to become obsolete—still able to perform the basic functions like phone calls and texts, but stuck with an old operating system and failing apps. The same struggle is now coming for cars.

Software-dependent cars are still new enough that it’s unclear how they will age. “It’s becoming the ethos of the industry that everyone’s promising a continually evolving car, and we don’t yet know how they’re going to pull that off,” Sean Tucker, a senior editor at Kelley Blue Book, told me. “Cars last longer than technology does.” The problem with cars as smartphones on wheels is that these two machines live and die on very different timescales. Many Americans trade in their phone every year and less than 30 percent keep an iPhone for longer than three years, but the average car on the road is nearly 13 years old. (Tesla didn’t respond to a request for comment about how its cars age.)

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 4 points 3 hours ago

Every single person with a working brain has been complaining about making cars more and more "connected" and reliant on software - it makes the cars LESS safe and less repairable. Heater or AC won't work? Sorry, you gotta subscribe to unlock that. Any customer who looks at that and says "That makes sense, the company can't give that out for free" is a fucking idiot who deserves to be scammed out of their money

[–] skozzii@lemmy.ca 11 points 8 hours ago

This article highlights a Tesla problem, not an EV problem.

The issue when you build a car around software is the software gets outdated and the the car is garbage.

Open sources EVs can be kept on the road just as easily as gas vehicles, as long as the gates are open to access the software.

Tesla has created their own issue, which will destroy them.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 2 points 13 hours ago

Software-dependent cars are still new enough that it’s unclear how they will age.

Not at all. They die young.

[–] noxypaws@pawb.social 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Bullshit article. Absolutely nothing about these problems is unique to EVs.

[–] skaffi 0 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Indeed. It's probably more that increasingly more commodities are becoming "smart", including, but not limited to EVs. I think the reason people are specifically noticing or talking about the "ensmartification" of EVs is because cars are so vastly much more expensive than any other "smart" commodity that, and for most people, an investment of that size needs to be something you can either rely on working for X number of years, or at the very least insure yourself against that happening. But a gadget that can be turned hostile to you, at the drop of a single auto-update, is anything but reliable or dependable - and to my knowledge, becoming enshittified represents a "special" kind of broken, that you can't insure yourself against.

[–] noxypaws@pawb.social 3 points 4 hours ago

Again. None of this is unique to EVs. Cars with internal combustion engines are at least equally as enshittified. At LEAST.

[–] nolikeymachine@lemmy.zip -1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

This article is nonsense. However, electric cars have a lot to overcome before they're able to actually take over the whole market. Personally I don't know anyone who wants an electric car. They've already came out and said that they didn't have enough material for enough batteries for everyone in the US to have an electric car. The power grids can't support everyone having an electric car. The batteries usually go bad around 10-15 years old, which are very expensive to replace which also prevents people from wanting to buy one because it costs more to replace the battery than most vehicles cost to replace the engine and the engine lasts much longer than 10 years (unless it's a Hyundai or you don't change the oil). So a lot of people would just put it up for sale and try to buy another car but nobody would buy it for what it's worth. Again, they have a lot of issues to correct before everyone having an electric car is even remotely feasible.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 11 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

They’ve already came out and said that they didn’t have enough material for enough batteries for everyone in the US to have an electric car

17 million last year, 60 million in total globally. Where do you get your information.

The power grids can’t support everyone having an electric car.

sure they can. They support everyone having a toaster or a dryer.

The batteries usually go bad around 10-15 years old

300,000 -400,000 miles.

How many ICE cars make it to 400,000 miles?

prevents people from wanting to buy one because it costs more to replace the battery than most vehicles cost to replace the engine and the engine

This has been true in ICE for decades.

[–] nolikeymachine@lemmy.zip 1 points 34 minutes ago

Lmaooo your logic is so broken. The new new electric vehicle batteries are only rated for 15-20 years at the most. Not including the reduced lifespan that they have already been proven to have in the cold northern states and the issues that salty roads introduce to that. But just for arguments sake the average American drives 13,500 miles a year. Which comes to just over 200,000 miles in 15 years and 270,000 miles in 20 years. And that's IF you get the maximum life. I know PLENTY of people who have well over 300,000 miles on their gas vehicles and diesels last even longer. And the batteries cost around $10,000 on average but the range is $5,000 to $20,000. Engines range from $3,000 to $7,000 new and you have options for used or remanufactured for cheaper (which you can't do for batteries). And you can't literally just Google it, our electrical grids CANNOT currently support everyone having an electric car. Hell California can't even make it through the summer without grid outages due to overuse just from air conditioning lmao. If you just Google it you will find out that they have already done studies that show we need to put around 2 trillion to 4 trillion dollars into our electrical infrastructure (neighborhood transformers and house electrical panels) and main transmission grid systems in order to support everyone switching to electric vehicles. And it would take a few decades to get it all completely done. But realistically given we had the funding already setup we could likely have most people ready to go in about 15 -20 years and everyone done by 30 years. But we don't so it'll be at least 30. And once more and more people get electric vehicles and they improve designs and improve batteries, then it'll likely take less power and batteries will likely be cheaper and easier to make. And once all of that happens, then gas powered vehicles will start to completely fade away. But they'll still be the better option (for the general population) until all of those things happen

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Jolteon@lemmy.zip 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Pretty much all the cars that weren't made in the last decade or so.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Putting aside from the implied EV context, I'm not sure I'd go that far. They were repairable, but had a lot of proprietary design in them as well.

I would still go with one of the "legacy" manufacturers for myself, though.

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 119 points 2 days ago (26 children)

The writer owns a tesla.
All communication disregarded.

[–] andyburke@fedia.io 36 points 2 days ago

Thank you for saving me the click. 🤝

load more comments (25 replies)
[–] 18107@aussie.zone 41 points 1 day ago (2 children)

My 2012 Nissan Leaf is still doing fine.

Maybe it's not an issue with EVs, but with overbearing automakers.

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 13 points 1 day ago

I really don't think it has much to do at all with ICE vs Electric vehicles. It just so happens that both transitions are going on at the same time. If anything, the electronics involved in running an average modern ICE vehicle are more complicated and more proprietary than an average electric vehicle.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 day ago

Tesla now makes the battery pack integral with their gigapress frames, so the batteries cannot be replaced. The cars are glued together over cast aluminum so yeah, it's a fucking iphone on wheels.

[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

i wonder when first teslas start bricking up just so people have to buy new one

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 3 points 13 hours ago

They already brick any Tesla with a salvage title from using a supercharger.

[–] Texas_Hangover@lemmy.radio 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They already catch on fire like Richard Pryors Samsung lol.

[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 2 points 13 hours ago

yes but that is due to incompetence and cost cutting. What i mean is when they start deliberately bricking them. There is no way ol stinky wont do that at some point to fleece even more money

[–] dom@lemmy.ca 37 points 2 days ago (9 children)

Isnt this all cars and not just evs?

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] philpo@feddit.org 13 points 1 day ago

Well, the AM transmitter in the old car won't work anymore as well.

Cars do age the same in terms of user experience - they are simply frozen in the state they are. (And at least within the EU can be operated fully offline)

The author seems to be more concerned that his car might not get "new features" anymore - and that bothers hims as the "free update" culture is extending to a lot of things. Technology advances but nothing has changed about that - that was always the case and now we can at least update some things.

While I would love to have a carnaker offer a open source plattform that would make people able to update and modify the entertainment/navigation part of their car I actually spoke to a car makers product manager about it - and sadly the multitude of regulations cars fall under in their various markets makes that basically impossible.

More important would be that we campaign for other things in terms of laws (some are in place in the EU but are currently under pressure):

  • Manufacturers need to provide security updates for online functions for 10 years after the end of production.

  • Manufacturers need to provide navigation updates for 5 years after the end of production

  • Cars need a designated fully offline mode

  • Driving data obtained must not be used for commercial purposes. (Currently already implemented in the GDPR)

  • Important and often overlooked: Manufacturers must provide service software tools for cars for ALL repair shops and for at least 20 years after end of production. AND we need to work towards an open source industry standard.

load more comments
view more: next ›