Are we required to actually eat it? If so, chocolate, because I'd rather throw up once than get cholera. If not, maybe the shit just for novelty's sake.
this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2025
19 points (100.0% liked)
Would You Rather
906 readers
5 users here now
Welcome to c/WouldYouRather, where we present you with the toughest, most ridiculous choices you never knew you had to make! Would you rather have a third arm that's only useful for picking your nose, or be able to talk to animals but only if they're wearing hats? Yeah, it's that kind of vibe. Come for the absurdity, stay because you've clearly got nothing better to do with your life.
Rules:
- Follow dbzer0 rules.
- Start posts off with "WYR:"
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I'll have the chocolate stout
I'll take the latter... I'm not a coprophiliac so it won't affect me in any way whatsoever.
Shit might already taste like chocolate for all I know.
I'll take the first option, I prefer to know that I didn't eat shit. Then I'd say "this tastes like shit" and never eat chocolate again.
Everyone chooses the choccy flavoured poo, until they become sick from eating poo.
According to Europeans, American chocolate already tastes like vomit, so.... I guess I'm going for the chocolate that tastes like shit?