Not sure, exactly. One mod said it's too buggy, basically. Though, considering how much they complain about the big Reddit Mods and so on and so forth and talk a big game when it comes to transparency and so on, it's 100% reasonable, as well as entirely prudent and important - even vital - to have a (more) decentralized (you know, "web3" -esque), federated platform to discuss the whole GameStop thing.

The fact that they censor the word "Lemmy" and other hinting towards it from anyone tells you everything you need to know.

[–] mojo@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago

They don't actually want decentralization, they want crypto that they can ponzi scheme

[–] SubDRSive@lemmy.whynotdrs.org 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They prefer Classical music.

[–] MozooZ@lemmy.whynotdrs.org 2 points 2 years ago

badumtush

[–] OrganicBrotha@lemmy.whynotdrs.org 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So they can censor and stifle any new discussion

[–] MozooZ@lemmy.whynotdrs.org 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This is probably the most concise, albeit, cynical and probable reason when considering all factors.

[–] jersan@lemmy.whynotdrs.org 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

i mean what good-faith reason could possibly exist for banning any mention or discussion of the existence of Lemmy?

i can't see one

[–] MozooZ@lemmy.whynotdrs.org 2 points 2 years ago

Precisely.

[–] TheWiseAlaundo@lemmy.whynotdrs.org 5 points 2 years ago

Given all the warnings and threats that reddit admins have made, you'd think they'd appreciate lemmy being around