this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2026
44 points (95.8% liked)

PC Gaming

14148 readers
768 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 hour ago

The PRS needs to pay the wanker down the street for the licence to act like such bellends.

[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 48 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

PRS claims "many game titles which incorporate PRS members' musical works are made available on Steam," including "high profile series" such as Forza Horizon, FIFA/EA FC, and GTA.

This has "I'm throwing my lawsuit at everything and I hope it sticks" energy

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 16 points 5 hours ago

To me it looks like, "It's cheaper to sue this company rather than the individual companies even though we know we don't really have a leg to stand on".

[–] HeartyOfGlass@piefed.social 30 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

PRS claims "many game titles which incorporate PRS members' musical works are made available on Steam," including "high profile series" such as Forza Horizon, FIFA/EA FC, and GTA.

So what is Rockstar, EA, etc doing producing games without a proper music license? Why is Valve being punished for selling something those game devs didn’t have rights to distribute?

What about cinemas playing movie trailers that feature music? They need special permission beyond the licensing agreements already in place or something?

How about the games sold on Amazon? Epic?

Disband the clown show bringing this to court. Embarrassing.

[–] TrousersMcPants@lemmy.world 27 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure those games have licenses, this lawsuit is saying valve needs a separate license to distribute those games

[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 28 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Which... Is kinda fuckin bullshit?

[–] HeartyOfGlass@piefed.social 15 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Kinda really bullshit. This case states it's not enough to get permission from the publisher. Now every digital store would need to get licenses for the assets of the content they're selling, on top of a license for the final product.

Absurd.

[–] festus@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 hour ago

And then they can sue the hosting company Valve uses for distributing the assets without a license, and the ISPs that transmit the assets without a license, and the speaker manufacturers for playing the assets without a license, and ...

[–] shadowman98@lemmus.org 32 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

This doesn't look meaningful at all. Why target valve and not the developers and publishers of these games? Were they not licensed appropriately such that they were compensated for their use? To my untrained eye this seems like they're trying to double dip.

[–] popcar2@piefed.ca 30 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I did some research and apparently they're sueing Valve because they think any platform where users can download something using their music should pay them, too. The publishers/devs are paying but Valve isn't.

No idea how well that holds up in court.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 13 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Did music stores need licenses to sell CDs?

What does this mean for Apple Music or Spotify?

Valve doesn’t let you play the music, unless the publisher adds it and you purchase it separately as an OST (for which Valve is protected as that is the publisher’s actions).

If this succeeds then I declare anarchy. Rules are no longer a thing, anywhere. If corporations can just make up any bullshit they want then I’m going to start suing all the music industry associations for including their music in commercials which did NOT license my ears to receive it.

[–] kn33@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

What does this mean for Apple Music or Spotify?

They do license the music

[–] Shirasho@lemmings.world 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

As always the US music industry is showing it is a massive embarrassment.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 23 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

While your statement is true, PRS is UK.

[–] Shirasho@lemmings.world 5 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I've only just realized this after thoroughly reading more articles. Embarrassing, but I stand by my statement. I'm starting to wonder if this is a universal greed.

[–] Quetzalcutlass@lemmy.world 9 points 4 hours ago

The modern music industry is entirely built upon the idea of middlemen seeking rent from other people's work. They have a long history of trying to screw over musicians and customers for a little extra cash flow; them going after distributors as well tracks with all the other greedy and self-defeating shit they've pulled over the years.