this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2023
737 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

70847 readers
3011 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Inside the 'arms race' between YouTube and ad blockers / Against all odds, open source hackers keep outfoxing one of the wealthiest companies.::YouTube's dramatic content gatekeeping decisions of late have a long history behind them, and there's an equally long history of these defenses being bypassed.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Karyoplasma@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I would argue it's not "against all odds". The add-on devs probably know better how YouTube is working than the bunch of underpaid, outsourced script writers that are tasked to implement the stuff. The latter also have to make sure that it doesn't break for legitimate viewers (oh, sorry, I meant "impressions").

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Banana_man@reddthat.com 10 points 2 years ago (7 children)

To me it seems weird that YouTuber is doing this at all. They should know that they can't win, I doubt their CEO is that incompetent. Especially after all this time of wasted effort on their side to overpower a very small fraction of users who actually block ads online. Could it be to draw attention from something else that's actually more worrying?

Because as an AdBlock user, since I bothered configuring them and using only ublock I haven't had almost any popups and my experience, especially now on the later stages, is exactly like it was before the ban.

I can't help but think there's more to this because they can't be wasting resources, further damage their reputation and risk absolute monopoly on video platforms for a fruitless endeavor.

Even if YouTube isn't profitable by itself, which, given the user data harvesting and the ads I definitely doubt, google still is. I'd appreciate any takes on this because it's been bugging me for a while now.

[–] Alpha71@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

There's no need to look for conspiracies when the truth is simple enough. Current YouTube CEO Neal Mohan was senior vice president of display and video ads at Google. Ads has been his wheelhouse for quite awhile.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gila@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Google = biggest advertising company in the world

Youtube = biggest money drain for Google

Adblock = a direct obstacle to the longterm feasibility of Google's ability to ever reconcile the money drain against their primary product (advertising) and end up in the black

The current state of Youtube's profitability is a long way off mattering for anything. For all it costs to run, it can be sustained indefinitely without much issue. This will remain the case until Youtube advertising reaches saturation. Given how much stuff like TV ads still cost, we can safely say this is still a long way off, regardless of the potential rise of competing platforms.

The landscape of youtube & adblockers is unlikely to be the same then, and restrictive measures taken now aren't really representative of what it'll be like. The actions taken now are for 2 reasons: maintenance of consumer expectation, so that it doesn't feel like site monetization is changed substantially when the money faucet gets switched on. And market research.

I have no doubt that a primary intent behind recent actions to do with delays or slowdowns was to measure the blowback, using it a yardstick for further actions not yet taken, which will eventually culminate in some action which actually meaningfully changes Youtube's monetization. But this may not be for many years.

None of us here are really experiencing problems, we have only heard of them and are discussing them. When something new happens, you'll hear "what else is new? they've done [something similar to] this many times before", with those people ignoring that the historic actions were totally mitigated everytime. And in the process, we the vanguard of the internet keeping Google's advertising monopoly restrained by engaging with adblockers, become conditioned to yield to advertising and a Google-controlled internet.

Because that's the only way they can win. Barring serious pro-Google changes to privacy laws around the world, the ultimate means to force advertising simply isn't available to them. Their best hope is to try and convince us that blocking ads is just too much of a hassle, ideally without ever actually making it so in a way that causes some mass migration away from Youtube. That's not a hard line to tread

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Could Google and ad services sue Firefox and extension writers?

I mean, nothing pisses off corporations more than someone coming between them and revenue, and the courts tend to agree.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ModernRisk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 years ago

Got this too couple of times, all I did was F5 and go on with my day. Nothing happened.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I always wondered why YouTube doesn't stream the ad intermixed into the video? Like, it's DASH, right? How does that work, can't the server send a video then switch to another stream source (the ad) and back?

[–] zbyte64@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Because YouTube doesn't want you to skip ads? If the ad was just another part of the show, you would just fast forward past the ad.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Slagathor@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (7 children)

Serious question: what is the best add blocker right now? I've been using ublock origin, but it doesn't seem to be working that well these days.

[–] Amends1782@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I apologize for my strongopinion but I believe yours is misguided or similar. Ublock origin is objectively the best ad blocker , they are an extremely talented team, dedicated and have been for a long long time.

The enemy is getting stronger, not the defense not working well.

:)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sunbytes@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Apparently you need to clear the plugin's cache semi-regularly.

As sometimes it won't update itself as fast.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›