this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2023
324 points (84.9% liked)

Technology

71955 readers
4024 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] firewyre@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

It's well on it's way

[–] auf@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ArugulaZ@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It was morally bankrupt shortly after Seth McFarlane left too long under a heat lamp took over. In addition to all his other failings, Elon looks like McFarlane jerky.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] aleq@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

I think Twitter is going down, may or may not go bankrupt but I think it will lose relevance. Wonder if it will be replaced. Lots of people (myself included) kinda assume that bluesky, mastodon or some other twitter-like service will take over. But Twitter is not really necessary, so I don't think it's a given that something will take its place.

As a time sink, more multimedia-oriented platforms like Reddit/Lemmy, Instagram, Tiktok or Youtube, seem more attractive.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Of course it can. And it probably will. But that's what the plan was since the get.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nutsack@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

couldn't he just step down as CEO or sell the company? he could also delete his account. I imagine all of these things would make advertisers happy.

[–] fosforus@sopuli.xyz 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

He's not CEO of Twitter, just the sole owner.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 3 points 2 years ago

Let's hope it doesn't, I don't want those racist idiots joining any of the other social networks. Let it become the acceptable 4chan.... to siphon off the scum of the internet so that we don't have to deal with them.

[–] r3df0x@7.62x54r.ru 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

If he doesn't do something about the blatant racism on Twitter, I could see this happening. If he does do this, all the shit stains like Tim Pool will start spouting off about how the platform doesn't support "free speech."

[–] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

He's doing something about the racism, just not what he should be doing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BilboBargains@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Meelon Husk

[–] froh42@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Now even Betteridge's law is dead.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The companies paused adverts after an investigation by a US organisation, Media Matters for America, flagged ads appearing next to pro-Nazi posts.

In a fiery interview on Wednesday, Musk also used the "b" word - bankruptcy, in a sign of just how much the ad boycott is damaging the company's bottom line.

Mark Gay, chief client officer at marketing consultancy at Ebiquity, which works with hundreds of companies, says there is no sign anyone is returning.

When Musk puts chief executives "in his crosshairs" like this they will be even more reticent to be involved with X, says Lou Paskalis, of marketing consultancy AJL Advisory.

Jasmine Enberg, principal analyst at Insider Intelligence, adds: "It doesn't take a social media expert to understand and to know that publicly and personally attacking advertisers and companies that pay X's bills is not going to be good for business."

According to the New York Times, which got hold of the pitch deck Musk was giving to investors last year, X was supposed to bring in $15m from a payments business in 2023, growing to about $1.3bn by 2028.


The original article contains 1,032 words, the summary contains 184 words. Saved 82%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No. Whoever wrote this doesn't understand bankruptcy.

If things got really bad creditors would take control and sell the business to shareholders who would install a clean CEO who would entice advertisers back.

No one would utter the b-word.

[–] bassomitron@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Twitter isn't public, though. Elon took it private when he took over, so there aren't any shareholders beyond Elon and the Saudis who chipped in money to buy it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›