this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2023
106 points (92.1% liked)

Memes

45581 readers
1 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Scout339@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago (3 children)

So... Tell me how vegan alternatives to items reduce carbon footprint lol.

Vegans in ideology make sense, but if you are paying more for food [that's worse for you, instead:] just buy local stuff from your farmers market or ethically-farmed things... Local eggs, cows, vegetables... Surely this can't be unreasonable.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

I think veganism is useless. However, I'm not going to argue

[–] A_Chilean_Cyborg@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Voting >>>> Personal energy usage [Using public transit instead of driving, Electric heating, efficient buildings, etc] >>>>>>>>>>>>> Non energy lifestyle choices.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Galven@lemm.ee -4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's not them not eating meat that I have a problem with(even though it's not healthy), it's the self-righteousness of it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MavTheHack@lemmy.fmhy.ml -5 points 2 years ago (11 children)

To be fair. There is much debate around whether livestock is indirectly carbon neutral with very valid studies on both sides

[–] TofuSauce@beehaw.org 0 points 2 years ago (2 children)

got any reading on that ? legit never heard that before

[–] PaulL@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Check out the "sodcasts" of Peter Ballerstedt on his YouTube channel. He's a forage agronomist with a lot of knowledge. You may not like his conclusions, but he gives you the data to check them out.

[–] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

I looked on google scholar to see any of their papers. Most of what I could find doesn't seem to be exactly peer-reviewed articles nor are most really cited by any other papers. At that they are making rather bold claims with rather weak evidence

[–] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

See my comment further down the thread going into detail about how this is not the case https://lemmy.ml/comment/646750

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›