this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
2033 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

76358 readers
1061 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 18 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Forced to implement is the wrong term - they were tasked with designing it. They can't just swap one person out for another - losing the lead dev or designer would be delay or kill the effort

They could've pushed back - software ethics is a required course for very good reason - but it's easy to never ask if you should do something and skip straight to how. It gets easier to skip that piece every time, and the company isn't going to respect it - we need outside pressure so they can point to us and say "this will have repercussions"

They don't deserve death threats, but trashing everything they push on GitHub is fair. Measured steady pressure - save the most extreme stuff for upper management and shareholders

For the engineers you have to make them understand they did bad and they should feel bad, they need to feel that their peers have lost respect for them, not that this is the public lashing out

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] zerkrazus@lemm.ee 17 points 2 years ago

Yes because that's beneficial to society and definitely not solely for the purpose of making the company and their executives richer.

[–] Oka@lemmy.ml 16 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's NOT the engineers. It's the executives and corporate management that decides that. The engineers just get paid to implement it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MonsiuerPatEBrown@reddthat.com 16 points 2 years ago (1 children)

"Curse googles sudden but constant betrayal!"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Techmaster@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago (11 children)

It's almost like Google wants me to trade my android phone in on an iphone.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] LemmyRefugee@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago (8 children)

I think the key is not Firefox but Apple. If Apple does not join the DRM web future, Google cannot force it.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] knobbysideup@lemm.ee 14 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Imagine if ads had remained a single static banner at the top/bottom of the page and was hosted by the site itself. Maybe there wouldn't be an arms race to infiltrate every aspect of our digital lives.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago (2 children)

They can't stop dns filters :)

[–] Virulent@reddthat.com 13 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Yes they can. DNS blocking doesn't stop YouTube ads, for example. They could also force chrome to use their own DNS servers and use attestation to make sure you're not bypassing that somehow

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›