lemonhead2

joined 1 month ago
[–] lemonhead2@lemmy.world 6 points 19 hours ago

if don't work then:

  1. if ur rich, u don't need to
  2. if not, u rely on welfare programs

of those that are not rich, and not working, there are some that cant work, or cant find work, and don't want to work. the first two groups seem to get ignored and the last one gets all the negative publicity

[–] lemonhead2@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (14 children)

what were the comments? do you remember them or have screenshots?

I'm curious as to whether disagreeing with their viewpoint is banable, or if your disagreement was rude/offensive in some other way that earned the bann

either way, good job, congratulations, and welcome

[–] lemonhead2@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

one thing I remember about that movie. walmart grew so big it bought everything else. all stores are now Walmart. and all restaurants are taco bell.

[–] lemonhead2@lemmy.world 58 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (4 children)

well for 33 felonies they made him president to avoid jail time. if you add in, child rape I guess they will make him emperor?

[–] lemonhead2@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

yep. how exactly can Google divest

[–] lemonhead2@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

just say the video. the choreography was azing. better than anything I've ever seen. esp since this is done live!!

I loved his political statements and message. music was meh...

[–] lemonhead2@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

did this only come to light now? or was this known back in 2019?

[–] lemonhead2@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

oh what's roosh v forum

[–] lemonhead2@lemmy.world 110 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

IF we have a FAIR AND FREE election!!

should be a given in this day and age. but yet I'm questioning it...

[–] lemonhead2@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

i never thought I would see the day where I didn't outright cringe / disagree with MTG

[–] lemonhead2@lemmy.world 36 points 1 month ago

sounds to me like they are trying to incite violence. and then respond with more violence.

also, they know they can lie without consequence. they have a prepared speech smearing the victim before even looking at the facts. the media attention is short... so before things get too hot on this victim they move to something else

45
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by lemonhead2@lemmy.world to c/science@lemmy.world
 

Academics produce papers and give it to Elsevier for free. Academics referee the paper for free. Elsevier sells the papers back to Academics. This has been their business model for some time... but now they've found another way to monetize you. They sell your data.

view more: next ›