AMUSING, INTERESTING, OUTRAGEOUS, or PROFOUND

2443 readers
148 users here now

This is a page for anything that's amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.

♦ ♦ ♦

RULES

❶ Each player gets six cards, except the player on the dealer's right, who gets seven.

❷ Posts, comments, and participants must be amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.

❸ This page uses Reverse Lemmy-Points™, or 'bad karma'. Please downvote all posts and comments.

❹ Posts, comments, and participants that are not amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound will be removed.

❺ This is a non-smoking page. If you must smoke, please click away and come back later.

❻ Don't be a dick.

Please also abide by the instance rules.

♦ ♦ ♦

Can't get enough? Visit my blog.

♦ ♦ ♦

Please consider donating to Lemmy and Lemmy.World.

$5 a month is all they ask — an absurdly low price for a Lemmyverse of news, education, entertainment, and silly memes.

 

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
1
 
 

Source: politico.com

2
3
4
5
 
 

Source: westword.com

6
7
8
 
 

Source: ocregister.com

9
27
The secret homeless (acebackwords5.wordpress.com)
 
 

If you live in the city, you probably notice the obvious homeless. The ones who are loud or odd or dischordant or obviously homeless looking. …. But let me tell you. There are a LOT of other homeless people. The “secret homeless.”...

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
 
 

After the war, comics became a scapegoat for American cultural and social insecurities in the new Cold War world: juvenile delinquency; crime; violence; sexual promiscuity; homosexuality; and more. The anti-comics crusaders came from all walks of American life: teachers; parents; children; politicians; clergy; intellectuals; medical professionals; journalists; and civic leaders. They were men and women, boys and girls, young and old, black and white, urban and rural. Unsatisfied with merely limiting access to materials deemed to be objectionable, these comics opponents often sought to physically destroy comic books.

24
25
 
 

Original link

Excerpt: The group was careful to avoid politics, she said, and instead focused on several key questions: Had the sandwich actually “exploded all over” CBP agent Gregory Lairmore, as he’d testified? (Specifically, they analyzed—and at times mocked—Lairmore’s claim that “I had mustard and condiments on my uniform, and an onion hanging from my radio antenna that night.”) What was Dunn’s intent in flinging the grinder? And what actually constitutes “bodily harm”?

view more: next ›