r/Cars - For Car Enthusiasts

53 readers
1 users here now

r/Cars is the largest automotive enthusiast community on the Internet. We're Reddit's central hub for vehicle-related discussion, industry news,...

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
276
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/cars by /u/Standaloneoak on 2025-07-15 19:02:20+00:00.

277
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/cars by /u/Outlaw6985 on 2025-07-15 16:43:12+00:00.


morning everyone

I drive an older American muscle car, but even still I’d rather drive with my windows down, ac works but it’s not the best

I have CORBEAU A4 racing seats in my car that are material not leather (i hate leather). And the one big issue i’m running into is back sweat. my seat is pretty dam wet from the sweat during a drive.

has there been any type of product or solution to this I can put behind me or on the seat when I drive? i’m not asking for cooling seats but has anyone used or did something to help?

anything would be appreciated

278
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/cars by /u/DadgetIntrepid on 2025-07-15 09:46:12+00:00.

279
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/cars by /u/tastesinteresting on 2025-07-15 05:41:10+00:00.


https://youtu.be/3XWUksJAJGE

Slightly less efficient than the CLA, range up to 761km wltp and can charge up to 310km in 10 minutes.

Oh and it has illuminated stars on the glass roof that match the ambient lighting color. 😆

www.netcarshow.com/mercedes-benz/2026-cla_shooting_brake/

280
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/cars by /u/peetak on 2025-07-14 22:20:45+00:00.


Introduction:

Ever since seeing an E92 M3 ad for the first time, I was hooked. Playing it in Need for Speed: Undercover made me want it even more. Since graduating high school in 2009, I've had a few fun BMWs (E34 540i, E39 540i) but never an M. Anyway, I got older and life responsibilities come up so I stopped with the fun cars and got things that were more "adult and responsible" (Tacoma and X3). Well recently, I've hit some life goals and did a lot of the responsible things so decided I could treat myself and scratch the itch of having a fun weekend car once again and so began the hunt for a car.

My list comprised of: 987 Cayman base/S, E39 M5, E46 M3, E92 M3, Z4M (E86) and the 996 Porsche 911 Carrera 4S. Basically cars I thought were cool in my teens lol. No real rhyme or reason besides that.

First, the 996 was thrown out of contention simply because I could not find one that met my requirements (budget, manual transmission, coupe, decent mileage, good condition). Similarly, the Z4M, I could not find any in my province.

Eventually, for various reasons, I also eliminated the E39 and E46 (sacrilege I know, but most in my area were clapped out or in SMG or a convertible).

So I was down to choosing between a Cayman base/S or E92 M3 and I hummed and hawed at this for a good while. I test drove a Cayman base and a S and they are excellent cars. Small, nimble , balanced, fun. I didn't end up buying the ones I test drove because for the base the history wasn't great and I thought the seller was asking for too much and the S had non existent service history. But I was sold on a Cayman, preferably an S if I could find a good example.

So...why did I end up with the M3? Simply put, the sound of the V8, nostalgia and coming across a really good example. Found a dealer that had it listed and went to check it out. Checked all the boxes: full service history, rod bearings and throttle actuators done, 6 speed, carbon roof, EDC, decent mileage, stock. Then I drove it. And I remembered why I wanted one so desperately back in the day. The V8 induction noise is simply amazing and I was sold.

Styling:10/10 totally biased

Completely subjective category and completely biased but I think the E92 M3 is the best looking M3. The subtle differences between the M3 and the regular 3 series is what appeals to me. The hump in the hood (bonnet) because the S65 was too big. The flared fenders. Not so subtle but the quad exhaust tips. Just beautiful.

Interior: 7/10

Again subjective but it's a BMW interior. Nothing flashy, but comfortable. Mine is boring as interiors get as it's black, so not much to really write about. Good quality, no rattles or squeaks and everything has held up well.

Tech/Features:5/10 (it's from 2008, what are you expecting)

I didn't get an M3 from 2008 for the tech lol. Mine is a "double hump" which means it comes with the ancient iDrive system. Ideally it would have been a single hump but was not a deal breaker. Surprisingly, I don't hate the iDrive system. It's obviously outdated but it's easy enough to use to set my custom settings.

Also included in mine is the premium audio (individual audio) and the speaker quality is amazing. Not really an audiophile but I can noticeably tell the difference in quality from my X3 (regular audio) and the M3. Again, not something I was looking for but a nice to have.

Car came with the comfort access which lets me unlock the door without having to use the fob. This is noted because neither of my newer cars have that so I found it hilarious. Also I don't have to put the fob in the slot and then push the ignition button which is nice (common for mid to late 2000s cars).

Ride/Handling:8.5/10

Take this with a grain of salt because I'm not a race car driver and the M3 is the sportiest car I've owned and the second sportiest car I've driven (after the Cayman).

The EDC (electronic damper control) option gives me the option to put the suspension in various settings: comfort, sporty, sportier. The car is comfortable in comfort setting; rides like a a sporty luxury car. Sporty in middle setting and sportier but not quite harsh in the sportiest setting. I tend to leave it in the middle setting for most drives and switch it to the sportiest on some more spirited drives...as expected, no surprise there.

The handling didn't surprise me but surprised me at the same time? If that makes sense? I expected it would handle well, being an M car, but being an older car I tempered my expectations (especially after driving the Cayman) and I guess that's why I was a bit surprised. Obviously, it won't match the Cayman, but the M3 is planted through corners and on 180 degree highway ramps. It is an amazing handling car for the type of driving I do (aka nowhere near the limit) . It feels stable, predictable and honestly, probably flatters my actual abilities. The steering is hydraulic and solid. It's communicative and feels good. Obviously leagues better than my X3 and Tacoma but also much better than my old E34 and E39 (predictably as they're older cars and not M cars). The Cayman's steering felt less numb in my opinion but the M3's is no slouch.

Engine:10/10 totally biased

Basically the reason I fell in love with the car. Oh my god this engine. "Only" 414hp and 295lb-ft of torque. Low numbers for the current age when the current generation M3 puts out 473hp and 406 lb-ft.. A big complaint about the engine is the relatively low torque numbers. Well...the car is still fast. I think the way cars have been developed really desensitized us to hp figures. The engine is amazingly responsive, even for a NA engine. The individual throttle bodies make the response damn near instant (in perception). The induction noise coming through the cabin when you step on the throttle is simply one of the best sounding things I've ever heard. The engine pulls hard and pulls smooth. At almost an 8400 rpm red line, the engine screams when you let it get into the higher ranges and boy does it love to be in the higher rev ranges. This engine wants to be there and if you drive it there you're rewarded for it.

One of the big issues with the engine is the reliability; most serious are the rod bearings. Throttle actuators are also an issue. Thankfully both had been addressed on my car by the previous owner. Even then, I'm diligent in letting the engine warm up to proper temps before opening it up.

Transmission: 8/10?

Full disclosure: my only experience with manual transmissions are my old BMWs and the Caymans I test drove and some old beat up army trucks.

People complain about mushy BMW transmissions. I don't really get it because..well limited experience with different types of manuals. The M3 has a better transmission than both my old BMWs and thankfully old army trucks. Feels precise and goes into the gears easily. The clutch is super easy to use. Now in comparison to the Porsche I would say it's less precise, but not by much. For the clutch I prefer the BMW clutch but that's probably because it's what I am used to.

Conclusion:

It is not a perfect car. It's a car that has been driven. It's got some faults in the paint. Whoever initially put on the front plate bracket put it on crooked. One of the emblems is a bit tarnished. The stupid seat belt helper doesn't actually give you your seatbelt (I coded this out). It has 155000 km on it. It's been in a minor-moderate accident which will effect the resale. But I don't care, I'm keeping it forever if I can.

I'm a terrible photographer but here's a pic: https://imgur.com/a/VkXQyeh

Also I know I see the hood gap too. Common ish on the E92s? I have to adjust the hood and/or bumper.

281
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/cars by /u/Car-face on 2025-07-15 03:21:08+00:00.

282
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/cars by /u/Dazzling-Rooster2103 on 2025-07-15 00:30:17+00:00.

283
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/cars by /u/FeemBleem on 2025-07-14 17:21:17+00:00.


This is very likely headed to North America, if the Mitsubishi Momentum 2030 press image says anything...

284
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/cars by /u/Car-face on 2025-07-14 09:43:29+00:00.

285
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/cars by /u/Fearless_Neat_6654 on 2025-07-14 09:21:22+00:00.


It's been more than 2 weeks since Chevrolet teased a time. Lol, it seems like for whatever reason they've decided not to share the lap times.

Since they were testing the Z06, ZR1, and ZR1X, I'd imagine the times being:

Z06 – around 7:00

ZR1 – around 6:45

ZR1X – around 6:40

People have been speculating 6:28 for the ZR1X, but GM has since shut that down. Tbh, I think that speculation is exactly why GM is hesitating to release the times now, they probably feel anything slower will come off as disappointing.

286
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/cars by /u/ByteWanderer on 2025-07-14 07:44:14+00:00.

287
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/cars by /u/tigim101 on 2025-07-14 01:01:12+00:00.


I like to drive fast. If a car has any time of pep to it I’m likely going to be doing 5-15 over atleast. Most people do this anyway (I live in tri state area) where I live but I realize it’s not the best habit.

That is until I drove a Toyota 4Runner. Something about that car, it felt like a big lazy truck, I was totally happy doing 55 mph on the highway with my arm leaning against the door with the window down.

Any other cars that just make you chill out and want to cruise?

288
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/cars by /u/shades92 on 2025-07-14 00:20:14+00:00.

289
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/cars by /u/ilikerwd on 2025-07-13 19:29:28+00:00.


Background:

Yesterday I went one of my car window shopping Saturdays. I am looking to getting a practical daily to travel to and from another city that is 400km away from my home every other week. I do those trips on my X5 right now and it's fantastic but it's also excessive for just me & my dog. It's also a bit big to drive around in Mexico City and park. I'd like to save the X5 for family trips where it is worth it. I live in Mexico.

The Cars Tested:

I was able to do quite extensive test drives of both a '25 GTI and a '25 Acura Integra A-Spec. Both are only available here in a single trim level. No manuals available. The GTI is basically fully loaded except that we don't get the 19" wheels or the DCC suspension. The Integra is fully loaded with a CVT automatic.

They are very close in price. The GTI is $836,990 (~USD 44,000) pesos and the Acura is $869,900 pesos (~USD 45,700). Both prices include 16% VAT and other applicable taxes. The GTI is German built and the Acura is built in the US.

Steering, Ride & Handling:

The steering feel and precision of the Acura is very noticeably superior to the GTI's. It has much better on center clarity, feels more precise and communicative. It is not a small difference.

Regarding body control, both are very good. The Acura is slightly softer but it also feels a slight tad lighter. The GTI is tighter and clearly has higher overall limits. The Acura has adjustable dampers but the range of adjustment is barely noticeable. The GTI has fixed dampers. The Acura rides slightly better but has more road noise as well. The GTI is a good compromise between sporty and comfortable that errs a bit on the sporty side.

Overall I'd call it a tie in this department. The Acura has better steering and feels lighter, but the GTI has better body control and higher limits. Both ride well enough.

Powertrain:

This is an easy win for the GTI. It has 261bhp to the Acura's 200bhp, much more torque, and a much, much stronger response in the lower revs. The DCT is also vastly superior to the CVT on the Acura. The engine sound, while nothing to write home about in either car, at least is somewhat sporty in the GTI's sports mode (even if fake). This is an easy win for the GTI.

The Acura is probably more economical to run, so there is that.

Interior Space and Comfort:

The GTI has less legroom in the back, but much better headroom. Both are very practical as they are hatches, which is what I am looking for. I think the GTI may have a slight edge here.

I just couldn't get comfortable in the Integra's seat. They seem too narrow and have a kind of wedge backrest shape that I couldn't get comfotable in. I am on the large side (1.94m/6'4", 92kg/202lbs). The seats on the GTI are much better for me.

Interior quality of materials I think is better in the Acura, but I like the design of the interior more on the GTI, probably because I am very used to german cars in general.

Sound System: The ELS sound system on the Acura is a lot better than the H/K on the GTI. No contest, the Acura has a better sound system.

Amenities and Infotainment:

The new VW system has a larger screen and is more responsive. The Acura's system feels a little dated. The GTI wins here.

Adaptive Cruise System: I didn't try the adaptive cruise on the GTI because it is the same system that I am familiar with on my GF's Taos. I did try the Acura's system and my initial impression is that it is inferior. It works only at higher speeds, leaves too much distance to the car in front and is a bit slow to react.

Overall: I am leaning a lot towards the GTI. The Acura is a very good car but I fear those seats can be a dealbreaker.

290
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/cars by /u/oneonus on 2025-07-13 18:37:44+00:00.


Nissan has suspended U.S. production of three vehicle models for Canada as auto tariffs complicate cross-border trade.

291
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/cars by /u/whitevwjetta on 2025-07-13 18:25:49+00:00.

292
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/cars by /u/SugarDaddyDelight on 2025-07-13 16:56:44+00:00.

293
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/cars by /u/Quick_Coyote_7649 on 2025-07-13 04:54:53+00:00.


Key Notes:

-In September it will debut at the Munich Auto Show -The grill is inspired by the 300SEL 6.3 -It will have 404+ mile range -It will support 800V charging -It will be 3.2 inches longer then the GLC -Based on an implication from Mercedes-Benz’s ceo, it will have sub four second 0-62 mph.

294
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/cars by /u/mpgomatic on 2025-07-13 12:10:43+00:00.


If you've never posted, today's the day. We make this what it is.

295
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/cars by /u/snowfordessert on 2025-07-12 19:32:49+00:00.

296
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/cars by /u/wander9077 on 2025-07-12 17:13:24+00:00.

297
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/cars by /u/brahlicious on 2025-07-12 08:01:13+00:00.


Insane result. Roughly three times the auction estimate.

Those R34 speculators must really be salivating over the interest to come in 90's JDM halos 🤤

It still seems like an overpay to me since I don't imagine it was the best quality build. Could be wrong though.

298
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/cars by /u/Dazzling-Rooster2103 on 2025-07-12 14:46:37+00:00.

299
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/cars by /u/snowfordessert on 2025-07-12 05:37:17+00:00.

300
 
 
This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/cars by /u/whitevwjetta on 2025-07-12 02:21:34+00:00.

view more: ‹ prev next ›