Endless War

Trudeau highlighted a joint effort with the UK and Poland under which they have “provided military training to over 44,000 Ukrainian troops” since 2015

Same lying scum claims war was unprovoked.

In provoking/sustaining Neocon/US/CIA war of evil, US backing out, is not a recipe to take on a losing evil with the colonies going alone. It is extremely embarrassing in face of US extortion of Canada to cling to propaganda evil disinformation, with a mission for collapsing failure that facilitates US takeover.

Canada needs Russia's help to deter US takeover. Not to place itself on nuclear target list, or kill our enslaved soldiers to win the Ukrainian hate diaspora vote.

A day before getting Paliament and him both immune from elections, he said he'd resign for peace. Ukraine needs leadership that Russia can trust, because that is who will provide security guarantees to Ukraine.

A truly shameful war that should be a lesson to any puppet that desires to serve US geopolitical goals of corruptly suiciding their nation for bribes. Off to France to enjoy your riches, Volodymyr.

NATO colonies are the ones resisting this. The geopolitical danger is becoming isolated from both US and Russia, and conquered even harder as a result.

Advice is even more important for the NATO colonies, who are being betrayed by CIA agents that claim to love their countries.

If no value is offered in return, then Ukraine is more likely to sign deal with EU or China instead. Only good news is forcing an end to war.

Afghanistan and Iraq had/have all of their funds in a US bank. Iraq can't get US to leave while keeping their oil revenue. Afghanistan just got their treasury plain stolen. US promises to spend locally are never solid.

The corruption of war through bribing puppet Ukraine leadership to voluntarily destroy Ukraine to the last Ukrainian, makes "sensible" paying the US or other war instigators from the ruins.

While even $90B is too much, humanizing extortionists who Ukraine has been serving to diminish Russia at their insistance, would normally be a non-starter in a country claiming democracy.

At least Europe is now talking to Russia instead of banning Russian information... baby steps

article is still focused on "we desperately need to make the US our reliable friend, and must continue to make Russia an enemy"

Europe’s urgent task is to relearn how to acquire and wield power; it must be prepared to confront adversaries and sometimes friends, including America, which will still be there after Mr Trump. Instead of cowering, it needs an objective appraisal of the threat.

The objective appraisal of the threat is that EU is protected from US by an ocean. Doing trade based on lowest bidder with counties, like Russia, who have never threatened Europe is orders of magnitude more practical than begging the US to extort it.

Mix of focuses between "traditional diminishment of Russia" objectives and the direct threats made by US, in this key security conference.

US efforts to hamstring China are likely to intensify – but Beijing could also benefit from US withdrawal from international commitments or Washington’s alienation of longstanding partners. The survey, for instance, shows that in every G7 country the risk represented by the US has increased more than the perceived risk posed by Russia. The environment, including extreme weather events, is perceived as a greater risk in every country surveyed except the UK and Germany.

It is correct to look to normalizing relations with Russia, and distancing from US in current environment. It will tend to be a slow/quiet process from establishment politics in NATO colonies. By far, the most prescient shift establishment parties can make for electoral chances against "far right" (nato skeptics being their most dangerous ideology) is resistance to US demands instead of continued/increased sycophancy.