this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2024
85 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13473 readers
1 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

He was talking to two dudes who liked like tire mechanics. I saw him right when I was entering the building so I didn't really get a chance to check it out. Idk if it was a shirt for an org or what, as far away as I was it may have been an anti-communist shirt for all I know. I was hoping I'd see him again when I left but sadly he was gone.

Anyway I just thought that was weird.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ikilledtheradiostar@hexbear.net 15 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (4 children)

If its made to order in a union shop, shirt too, then 40 bucks is probably what it costs with some proceeds going to podcast and probably artist .

Most things are cheap now BC of massive exploitation. As multi polarity increases expect most things to become more inline with this shirt.

[–] bumpusoot@hexbear.net 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

That might be true if the shirts were made to order in union shops with vaguely fair profit sharing. There's nothing I can see to indicate that's the case here, though, just bourgeois decadence.

[–] Chronicon@hexbear.net 9 points 11 months ago (2 children)

bourgeois decadence is when branded merch? communism is when you only dress in the cheapest possible clothing?

I have some hesitance about it too, but admittedly it wouldn't be non-exploitative even if this happened in a union shop with great profit sharing. The raw materials and t-shirt blanks would likely be another story, and so would the delivery and payment processing, and union shops aren't exactly revolutionary even if they tend to be better for workers.

I can see the argument that its more important to build up a communist media apparatus (and this requires money) than to refuse to make money by not selling anything because of ethical concerns that are basically impossible to fully address.

[–] bumpusoot@hexbear.net 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Sorry, I clearly didn't deliver it well, but the "bourgeois decadence" was honestly just a joke. I agree with all thata you said.

[–] Chronicon@hexbear.net 1 points 11 months ago

ur good i just have no sense of humor sometimes and when im unsure I seriouspost