this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2024
128 points (84.8% liked)

A Comm for Historymemes

2722 readers
1122 users here now

A place to share history memes!

Rules:

  1. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia, assorted bigotry, etc.

  2. No fascism, atrocity denial, etc.

  3. Tag NSFW pics as NSFW.

  4. Follow all Lemmy.world rules.

Banner courtesy of @setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lugal@lemmy.ml -1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That is one application of the idea. Most people use the concept to privatize commonly owned or state own things which ironically leads to companies that destroy rivers and stuff. There is research on which criteria make a common work and it's not surprising that the ownership model that was predominant for a long while actually work despite the fact that some white guy had a thought experiment and said it can't possibly work.

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I think it's kind of frustrating if it's seen exclusively as a pro privatization slogan since I don't know of another shorthand way of referring to the inherent challenges of managing shared resources, even if the person who coined the term was using it to argue for privatization.

[–] lugal@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago

I mean it's not wrong to use it that way but please consider the research into solutions of these challenges