this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2024
1028 points (100.0% liked)

196

18062 readers
688 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
1028
Stock Markrule (files.catbox.moe)
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by nicknonya@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] trolololol@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Intel fabs can't catch up, that's not a recipe for success for high end chips. And that would mean they would face competition which means they'll be dead.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Sure they can. Intel is already gearing up 20A and 18A nodes, and those should leapfrog TSMC. Not that TSMC is staying still, either, but Intel will likely have the world's best density for a while.

[–] trolololol@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Meeh I've been hearing this in investor meetings for too long. If it was half true they wouldn't be so behind in their current node in stores.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 2 points 11 months ago

You hear it for that long because it takes a long time to build fabs.