this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2023
148 points (98.7% liked)
United States | News & Politics
7192 readers
1 users here now
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Seems like you're still missing my point? The article, as headlined, is designed get a rise and to get clicks.
More like presenting facts I don't care about. Would you care at all about this if it was one of my alternate headlines?
Getting closer to my point.
This is a pointless headline that no one cares about. It would be extremely not click-baity to the point that it's not newsworthy.
When I'm referring to bias I'm also talking about what is and isn't deemed newsworthy.
¯\(ツ)/¯
Or the news outlets could do a better job picking what to report on.
Yeah, I can agree with that.
The question is whether it's a news organization's job to amplify that. I don't really know the answer to that, but it really does seem irresponsible given all the other things that can be reported on.
Depends on how prominent that pedophile nazi is. But yeah, I think there's a line where it becomes kinda pointless noise. <rando nobody nazi> is a <bad thing> is a dumb story to report on, IMO.
Obviously.