this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2024
635 points (73.5% liked)

Political Memes

9657 readers
1193 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

So vote for them regardless and then they will listen?

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Dems need all 3 (presidency, house of reps, Senate) to do pretty much anything. They've had that for [drumroll please] 4 out of the last 24 years. Or 6 of the last 32 years. Or 6 of the last 44 fucking years.

[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They've had that for [drumroll please] 4 out of the last 24 years

It was significantly shorter than that when you consider Senate control to be 60, which is what's needed to bypass the fillibuster.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Supermajority was 4 months, out of the last 44 years. But whenever I mention that people think I'm fixated on that for some reason.

*Oh downvoted already. Some people really don't like hearing this.

[–] sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They honored the fillibuster by choice. They didnt have to.

[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They never had 51 votes to repeal the fillibuster. Sinema and Manchin both refused to do so. Neither of which are Democrats anymore. We should elect more Democrats to the Senate that will.

[–] sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

"Biden says eliminating filibuster would "throw the entire Congress into chaos"" https://www.cbsnews.com/live-updates/joe-biden-town-hall-filibuster/

[–] sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Dems need all 3 (presidency, house of reps, Senate) to do pretty much anything.

Thats not how politics works buddy. If what you said were true neither the dems or republicans would have passed any bills in the history of the "republic". Clearly theres also horse trading, and bribery/lobbying you are pretending dont exist in order to make this weak point.

[–] madjo@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago

With the obstructionist MAGA caucus in your government that would rather vote no to bipartisan bills because it would give a Democrat a win, barely any bills get passed!

[–] RustyEarthfire@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is an incorrect framing of the situation. You aren't being asked for a Yes/No vote on Democrats. You are being asked if you prefer Democrats or Republicans. Or for this election, if you prefer Democracy or Fascism. If you vote "no preference", that does not communicate "I prefer the Democrats, but want them to move further left", either logically or politically.

There are lots of ways to communicate desired policy changes: letter-writing, primaries (including campaigning/funding for candidates), protests, marches, press, social-media, etc. Voting against your interest is not one of them.

[–] sorval_the_eeter@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You are being asked if you prefer Democrats or Republicans.

I understand why you'd say this. But you arent trying to understand why people are trying to pressure the dem leadership to be better.

[–] RustyEarthfire@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I absolutely understand the anger at the Democratic party. I mention several useful activities to work toward fixing its many failings. The Republican party is strictly worse. Giving equal support to both is counterproductive.