this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2024
110 points (97.4% liked)

Futurology

3528 readers
9 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (7 children)

As of October 2023, 6,065 kilometres (3,769 mi) (38%) of the British rail network was electrified.

More than half is still old school

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (5 children)

That’s… surprising. Here in Japan, over 26,000 km of the 30,000 some-odd km of track is electrified. Most of the fueled trains are for freight, which only accounts for less than 1% of rail traffic.

What prevented the UK from deploying electrification to that extent? Is it politics or logistics?

[–] SlopppyEngineer@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Politics. They privatized rail and the private companies don't like doing the investment.

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So are battery trains expensive in the long run and have worse performance, and only being used because they're immediately cheaper than electrifying more rail?

[–] jonne 2 points 1 year ago

Pretty much, yeah. I also believe this is due to the infrastructure being run by different companies than the ones running the trains on them, so there's no incentive to invest in electrification.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)