jonne

Only the IDF claims they were 'warning' shots, everyone else says they were just fired at, but of course the NYT takes the IDF view as fact.

I mean, it's the same with the 'dual loyalty' trope. Yes, before Zionism it was pure anti-Semitism, but if you have Zionists in high places in multiple Western countries doing everything to support Israel even at the expense of the safety of said country, what else can you call it?

Or not to interact with anyone using windows. That's their point, doing everything right yourself is not enough, your privacy is breached by other users. It's similar to how Facebook has a ghost profile of you if someone else uploaded pictures with you on them.

Nah, it's the perfect position, be able look like you're pushing back while complaining you don't have the power to do it. A certain political party perfected that tactic.

Those are ICE agents, they already self select as the worst people, and you can always find a job as a private security guard it municipal cop or whatever if you have moral qualms about what you're doing.

A million and get a pilot licence.

Yeah, I know he's a kook, but he's right about some things. My guess is that they'll never let him do the sensible things and he'll only do the crazy shit like banning vaccines.

The SA President should've just said something like: "I look forward to seeing you make the case in front of the ICC, as we have done before."

So they're stopping trade talks, but continue supplying them with arms?

But aren't your texts protected by copyright as well?

I'm guessing they mention that to highlight he had a previous business relation with them.

That's actually hilarious.